UK election: Most likely outcome, time of results and key

uk election outcome odds

uk election outcome odds - win

Megathread: Attorney General Barr: No Widespread Election Fraud

Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
His comments come despite President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that the election was stolen, and his refusal to concede his loss to President-Elect Joe Biden.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said U.S. Attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election.

Submissions that may interest you

SUBMISSION DOMAIN
Bill Barr Just Kneecapped Trump’s Election Conspiracy Theory - Even Barr, one of Trump’s most loyal acolytes, thinks the election conspiracy stuff is insane. vice.com
Barr says no evidence of widespread fraud in presidential election cnn.com
No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome, Attorney General William Barr says oregonlive.com
AG Barr Says No Evidence of Widespread Voter Fraud After Trump Suggests DOJ Involvement in Election Rigging newsweek.com
Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome news.yahoo.com
Barr: DOJ yet to find widespread voter fraud that could have changed 2020 election foxnews.com
Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome politico.com
Barr Says DOJ hasn’t uncovered widespread fraud in 2020 election thehill.com
Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome apnews.com
Barr Says DOJ Hasn’t Uncovered Widespread Voting Fraud bloomberg.com
Attorney General Barr: No Evidence of Widespread Fraud That’d Change Presidential Election Outcome. wmur.com
Barr says he hasn’t seen fraud that could affect the election outcome washingtonpost.com
Attorney General Barr: No evidence of widespread voter fraud usatoday.com
No evidence of voter fraud that would change election outcome, AG William Barr says ktla.com
Barr says Justice Dept. hasn’t uncovered widespread voting fraud that could have changed election outcome bostonglobe.com
Barr Admits DOJ Found No Evidence of Voter Fraud That Would Change Election Results thedailybeast.com
DOJ hasn't uncovered widespread fraud that would change election results: Barr abcnews.go.com
Attorney General Bill Barr says no evidence of widespread fraud in 2020 election fox13news.com
Barr: No Evidence Of Fraud That’d Change Election Outcome huffpost.com
AG Barr says no evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome wsls.com
DOJ finds no evidence of voter fraud that would change 2020 election outcome independent.co.uk
Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome chicago.suntimes.com
Barr: No Evidence Of Fraud That’d Change Election Outcome m.huffpost.com
AG Barr: No evidence of fraud that'd change election outcome abc7chicago.com
Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome seattletimes.com
AG William Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome triblive.com
Atty General Barr said the DOJ hasn't found any evidence of widespread, results-changing voter fraud pbs.org
Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome dailyherald.com
Barr says DOJ has not seen evidence of fraud that would change election results axios.com
Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome washingtonpost.com
Barr: No Evidence of Fraud That Would Change Election Outcome bloomberg.com
DOJ has not found fraud that would reverse Biden win over Trump, Attorney General William Barr says cnbc.com
Barr future in doubt after Trump campaign blast him for denying widespread election fraud independent.co.uk
U.S. Justice Department has found no evidence of widespread voter fraud: AP reuters.com
Barr finds no evidence of voter fraud cbsnews.com
William Barr: no evidence of voter fraud that would change election outcome theguardian.com
Despite Barrage Of Losses In Court, Trump Camp Plans More Long-Shot Election Appeals wesa.fm
Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome seattletimes.com
US Attorney General: No fraud found that could change election aljazeera.com
Bill Barr Appointed John Durham as Special Counsel Two Weeks Before Election Day — Here’s What He’s Authorized to Investigate lawandcrime.com
Barr States The Obvious: No Mass Voter Fraud That Would Swing Election Results talkingpointsmemo.com
Trump campaign hits Barr for no "semblance" of an investigation after AG says no evidence of widespread fraud newsweek.com
Barr: DOJ Has No Evidence Of Fraud Affecting 2020 Election Outcome npr.org
Defying Trump, Attorney General Barr says the DOJ and FBI didn't discover any evidence of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election businessinsider.com
Trump allies Barr, Giuliani at odds on discredited election fraud claims reuters.com
William Barr says there is no evidence of widespread fraud in presidential election amp.cnn.com
Barr and Giuliani clash over allegations of election fraud politico.com
'I Guess He's the Next One to Be Fired': Even William Barr Says No Evidence of Widespread Voter Fraud commondreams.org
AG Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome washingtontimes.com
Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud apnews.com
Attorney General Barr Says DOJ Hasn't Uncovered Evidence of Voter Fraud That’d Change Outcome of 2020 Election time.com
US Attorney-General William Barr says no widespread voter fraud has been found in the election abc.net.au
After AG Bill Barr says no evidence of widespread fraud in 2020 election, 9 Texas Republicans decry "shocking lack of action" on allegations- U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, also called for the Supreme Court to hear one of Donald Trump's election lawsuits. texastribune.org
Despite Trump's continued claims, Barr sees no sign of major U.S. vote fraud reuters.com
Whistleblowers claiming USPS threw out, backdated ballots before election-New allegations as Barr claims no fraud foxnews.com
Barr says Justice Department found no evidence of fraud that would change election outcome msnbc.com
U.S. Attorney General William Barr said on Tuesday the Justice Department has found no evidence of widespread voter fraud in last month’s election, even as President Donald Trump kept up his flailing legal efforts to reverse his defeat. reuters.com
Analysis: William Barr breaks with Trump's election fantasy cnn.com
Barr splits with Trump on election; pardon controversy thehill.com
Bill Barr bashed in right-wing media after election fraud comments: 'He is either a liar or a fool or both' cnn.com
'Compromised': Fox News host slams Barr for rebuking Trump's election fraud claims haaretz.com
Are Republicans like Ron Johnson fools or liars, or both? As even Bill Barr admits the election was free and fair, the GOP has entered new territory. Now everyone has to say they believe conspiracies and the truth has become irrelevant independent.co.uk
submitted by PoliticsModeratorBot to politics [link] [comments]

Flatten the Curve. Part 84. Who are the What If Men. What is the People Machine? They Have Been Manipulating Society Using Simulations for a Long Time. The Worst is Yet to Come.

Previous Post Here
Rock the vote! Power to the people! Get out and vote. Every vote counts. And the beat goes on. And on. And on. And on. And we buy it. Hook. Line. And sinker. Don't we? But, we live in a democracy! Yep. Sure do. We vote and then they do whatever they have planned. Seriously. Guantanamo Bay? Still there. Rich getting richer? Still happening. Gain of function testing on viruses? Still happening. Nafta? Who actually voted? No. One. Big bank bailouts? No choice. Get it? The illusion of choice is all it takes to pacify the masses. That's it. Our votes are the placebo effect.
Do some of us notice? Yes. A few. For all the good that does us. So why are they able to get away with it? Surely at some point we would have noticed. Well we did notice, and they adjusted, and we're still living with the consequences. When did we notice?
The Vietnam War.
All the pictures of body bags and all the reports of the horrors of war were too much. We questioned why? The answer wasn't good enough. An economic system. Sure they tried to convince us back then that it was because human rights and liberty. Ok. Then we fast forward to present day and we trade with Vietnam. But nobody says, HEY! AREN'T THEY EVIL COMMUNISTS! No. One. Why? Because those in charge learned. All the images of war changed. Now we only see video game targets on screen. Now we only hear of all the amazing technology making war so advanced! War has become a Walt Disney production. Sanitized for the masses.
How did they do it? How? Simple. They know in advance what stimulus will have the greatest effect on us, and what effect that stimulus will be. How? Simulations. And it's been going on for a very long time.

Simulations and Scenarios

In this scenario, we don’t want to marginalize the more extreme candidates, but make them more ‘Pied Piper’ candidates who actually represent the mainstream of the Republican Party,” read the memo. “Pied Piper candidates include, but aren’t limited to: • Ted Cruz. • Donald Trump. • Ben Carson. We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to [take] them seriously."
Oh. Ok. So Crooked Hillary's team wanted to pump up Trump. Let me say that again, Pump Up Trump (sounds like a new sex toy, doesn't it? I'll get my people to call your people and lets make this happen. It'll be huge and people will love getting screwed by it!). And then it gets worse.
“Just like everybody, I thought this was a Bush against a Clinton, that’s all it was going to be,” said former Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle. “When I saw the first set of debates, I would turn them on in an entertainment mode to see what Donald’s going to say today. It was funny." Source Here
Trump is funny. Ha. Ha. Ha. Let's get in some of that new Reality TV show called The Political Apprentice. Right.
So is Trump a part of something nefarious? Or is he fighting the Deep State? But what if the answer is more complicated than that? What if all the peices are moved, including President's, on purpose, and with a plan?
Crazy? Surely that's just plain nonsense and there's no way that could happen, right?
Well, let me show you some additional things before the Internet of Things is in everything and we can't do anything.

They Pick, You Vote, Don't Matter. They Already Know.

What? Preposterous you say? Let's travel back to JFK and the People Machine.
Consider the strange trajectory of the Simulmatics Corporation, founded in New York City in 1959. (Simulmatics, a mash-up of ‘simulation’ and ‘automatic’, meant then what ‘artificial intelligence (AI)’ means now.) Its controversial work included simulating elections — just like that allegedly ‘pioneered’ by the now-defunct UK firm Cambridge Analytica on behalf of UK Brexit campaigners in 2015 and during Donald Trump’s US presidential election campaign in 2016. Journalists accused Trump’s fixers of using a “weaponized AI propaganda machine” capable of “nearly impenetrable voter manipulation”. New? Hardly. Simulmatics invented that in 1959. They called it the People Machine. As an American historian with an interest in politics, law and technology, I came across the story of the Simulmatics Corporation five years ago when researching an article about the polling industry. Polling was, and remains, in disarray. Now, it’s being supplanted by data science: why bother telephoning someone to ask her opinion when you can find out by tracking her online? Wondering where this began took me to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, to the unpublished papers of political scientist Ithiel de Sola Pool. Simulmatics, hired first by the US Democratic Party’s National Committee in 1959 and then by the John F. Kennedy campaign in 1960, pioneered the use of computer simulation, pattern detection and prediction in American political campaigning. The company gathered opinion-poll data from the archives of pollsters George Gallup and Elmo Roper to create a model of the US electorate.
Lasswell, whose research on communication purported to explain how ideas get into people’s heads: in short, who says what, in which channel, to whom, with what effect? During the Second World War, Lasswell studied the Nazis’ use of propaganda and psychological warfare. When those terms became unpalatable after the war ended, the field got a new name — mass-communications research. Same wine, new bottle. Like Silicon Valley itself, Simulmatics was an artefact of the cold war. It was an age obsessed with prediction, as historian Jenny Andersson showed in her brilliant 2018 book, The Future of the World. At MIT, Pool also proposed and headed Project ComCom (short for Communist Communications), funded by the US Department of Defense’s Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). Its aim, in modern terms, was to try to detect Russian hacking — “to know how leaks, rumors, and intentional disclosures spread” as Pool described it.
Isn't that odd? Computers making predictions back in 1960. Computers analyzing human behavior in order to predict human behaviours and control the election outcome. And the scientist who it all started with came from MIT. And we wonder how all that Jeffrey Epstein money was spent.
The press called Simulmatics scientists the “What-If Men”, because their work — programming an IBM 704 — was based on endless what-if simulations. The IBM 704 was billed as the first mass-produced computer capable of doing complex mathematics. Today, this kind of work is much vaunted and lavishly funded. The 2018 Encyclopedia of Database Systems describes ‘what-if analysis’ as “a data-intensive simulation”. It refers to it as “a relatively recent discipline”. Not so. Buoyed by the buzz of Kennedy’s election, Simulmatics began an advertising blitz. Its 1961 initial stock offering set out how the company would turn prediction into profit — by gathering massive data, constructing mathematical models of behavioural processes, and using them to simulate “probable group behaviour”.
Do you really think these What-If Men are done and gone, set out to pasture like the cattle they manipulate? Really? Seriously. No. Obviously not. Or there wouldn't be such a fuss about Facebook and Cambridge Analytica. Same Crap. Different Flies. Only know there are more flies and the crap pile is bigger.
In 1963, on behalf of the Kennedy administration, Simulmatics simulated the entire economy of Venezuela, with an eye to halting the advance of socialism and communism. A larger project to undertake such work throughout Latin America, mostly designed by Pool and known as Project Camelot (Project Camelot, where have I heard that before?), became so controversial that the next president, Lyndon B. Johnson, dismantled it (sure he did). After 1965, Simulmatics conducted psychological research in Vietnam as part of a bigger project to use computers to predict revolutions. Much of this work built on earlier research by Lasswell and Pool, identifying and counting keywords, such as ‘nationalism’, in foreign-language newspapers that might indicate the likelihood of coups. Such topic-spotting is the precursor to Google Trends. Before his early death in 1984, Pool was also a key force behind the founding of the most direct descendant of Simulmatics, the MIT Media Lab. Pool’s work underlies the rules — or lack of them — that prevail on the Internet. Pool also founded the study of “social networks” (a term he coined); without it, there would be no Facebook. Pool’s experiences with student unrest at MIT — and especially with the protests against Simulmatics — informed his views on technological change and ethics. Look forward. Never look back. Source Here
Unrest and protest at MIT against Simulmatics. I guess you could call it Rage Against the Machine. Maybe we should ask Jeffery Epstein if that's a good name? He did invest a lot of money into the MIT Media lab, after all. Surely he has an opinion on it. Too bad he killed himself. Snicker.
Look forward. Never back. That sounds suspiciously like a No Regrets policy, doesn't it? The ends justify the means. Let's hurry up and get those vaccines out. We can test for them along the way. It's all good.
Decades before Facebook and Google and Cambridge Analytica and every app on your phone, Simulmatics’ founders thought of it all: they had the idea that, if they could collect enough data about enough people and write enough good code, everything, one day, might be predicted—every human mind simulated and then directed by targeted messages as unerring as missiles. For its first mission, Simulmatics aimed to win the White House back for the Democratic Party. The University of California political theorist Eugene Burdick had worked for Greenfield in 1956, but decided not to join Simulmatics. Instead, he wrote a novel about it. In “The 480,” a political thriller published in 1964, a barely disguised “Simulations Enterprises” meddles with a U.S. Presidential election. “This may or may not result in evil,” Burdick warned. “Certainly it will result in the end of politics as Americans have known it.” That same year, in “Simulacron-3,” a science-fiction novel set in the year 2034, specialists in the field of “simulectronics” build a People Machine—“a total environment simulator”—only to discover that they themselves don’t exist and are, instead, merely the ethereal, Escherian inventions of yet another People Machine. After that, Simulmatics lived on in fiction and film, an anonymous avatar. In 1973, the German filmmaker Rainer Werner Fassbinder adapted “Simulacron-3” into “World on a Wire,” a forerunner of the 1999 film “The Matrix,” in which all of humanity lives in a simulation, trapped, deluded, and dehumanized.
The Matrix? A people machine. A Total Environment Simulator. Yikes. That sounds extremely far fetched, doesn't it. Trapped. Deluded. And. Drumroll please. Dehumanized.
In 1967 and 1968, at home, Simulmatics attempted to build a race-riot-prediction machine. In 1969, after antiwar demonstrators called Pool a war criminal, the People Machine crashed; in 1970, the company filed for bankruptcy. (Most of its records were destroyed; I stumbled across what remains, in Pool’s papers, at M.I.T.) Source Here
A race riot machine that apparently failed? And look what happened nine months ago? Coincidence? Foreign power information warfare? AI training wheels? Kinda scary, ain't it? And guess what? We're not done yet.

Ithiel de Sola Pool

So the Simulmatics Corporation was responsible for this;
Sept 17, 2020 • In 1960, media reports of dark forces behind John F Kennedy’s winning presidential campaign caused what Jill Lepore calls a “national hullabaloo”. America’s new leader, it was widely reported, had clinched the victory with the help of a “secret weapon”: a super computer that crunched troves of data to profile voters, allowing Kennedy to better target his political messaging before the polls opened.
And now let's look deeper at somebody who worked at the Simulmatics Corporation, Ithiel de Sola Pool.
For all of Simulmatics’ efforts at automating prediction, it is company executive Ithiel de Sola Pool, an MIT academic with a focus on social networks, who in Lepore’s telling proves to be the most accurate prediction machine — foreseeing the “data-mad and near-totalitarian twenty-first century” that he was instrumental in helping to create. “In the coming atomised society, the information the citizen gets will arise from his own specific concerns,” he wrote in 1968, predicting a communications revolution, “customised news feeds” and the dismantling of party politics for a “politics of self, every citizen a party of one”. Source Here
That's extremely prescient. Did he predict the future or make it? What came first, the chicken or the egg? Don't matter. Don't care. Not at all. Because the end result is the same,
So what more can we find out about de Sola Pool? How about the fact that he studied Nazis and Communists? Heck, he studied totalitarianist speeches to figure out how words could carry power and influence. Over us. Overload us.
But how unethical was Pool? Well, the guy who risked everything to bring us the Pentagon Papers (the papers that proved the Gulf of Tomkins incident was a false flag) thought this: Daniel Ellsberg would later say of Pool, “I thought of him as the most corrupt social scientist I had ever met, without question.”
Not cool. Definitely. Not. Cool. Because if you naively believe that Pool’s research isn't being used by the Technocrats today, then more power to you. Believe what you want. Or should I say, believe what they want.
And who are "they"? They are the Rockefeller's and Rothschilds, the Technocrats, the World Economic Forum, the Bilderberg Group, CIA, NSA, and the Council on Foreign Relations.
Speaking of which.
At that point in his (Pool’s) career, he was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, advising several countries around the world. Pool felt that the world was underestimating the importance of communications and technical change. Source Here
Oops. Pool was a member of the CFR advising several countries around the world. Ok. Next step.
2004 • The transformation of the United States into a power able and willing to take a leading role in world affairs was not achieved solely through policy changes in Washington, DC, let alone simply by changes in the structure of world power. This chapter examines the vital role of the CFR in transforming American public opinion from ‘isolationist’ to ‘globalist’ as an important aspect of America’s rise to globalism. In this regard, the Council focused its energies to undermine and marginalise isolationism while promoting its own internationalist views as the best means to achieve the American national interest. Source Here
So if a bunch of unelected officials are officially changing policy, why do you vote? Rock the vote? Don't make me laugh. More like Don't Rock the Boat.
They started running simulations back in the sixties. Remember, Nixon was the odds on favorite to win. Kennedy was a long shot. And then, Kennedy was the President. Nixon probably wasn't happy. After all, he was part of the power structure. He went to Bohemian Grove. And then he had the rug pulled out from underneath him. And what did he end of calling Bohemian Grove attendees? A bunch of fags. Oops. Who pissed in his cornflakes?
They run simulations. Then they have different scenarios that dictate policy. Then they use the CFR, the WEF, the Rockefeller Group, and other NGO'S to adapt and shape future policy decisions to steer society. Heck. They probably even use the Mickey Mouse Club at this point.
November 21, 1971 • Of the first 82 names on a list prepared to help President Kennedy staff his State Department, 63 were Council members. Kennedy once com plained, “I'd like to have some new faces here, but all I get is the same old names.” Source Here
So a "People Machine" helped get JFK "elected" and his State Department list was mostly comprised of Council members. It's starting to look more and more like our heads of state are manipulated just like us, doesn't it? Let's jump back into the Pool one more time.
In 1965, he wrote "The Kaiser, the Tsar, and the Computer," an essay about a computer-simulated international crisis. Later, his interest in quantitative analysis and communications would contribute to computer models to study human behavior.

Computer Models aren't Playboy Centerfolds

It doesn't matter who gets voted in. They may think they're in charge. They may go along. Or they may think they're making changes. But, I guarantee you the changes they make are the changes those behind the scenes want. Even if our leaders know it or not.
No way! Thats crazy! Insane! Ok. Sure. But remember this, in a world of insanity, a sane man is always perceived as being insane. So let's dive into the DEEP END OF THE POOL and see what we can find.
October 2, 2019 • With AI, the models suddenly become more realistic. “One of the things that has changed is an acceptance that you really can model humans,” says F. LeRon Shults, director of the Center for Modeling Social Systems at the University of Agder in Norway. “Our agents are cognitively complex. They are simulated people with genders, ages and personalities. They can get married, have children, get divorced. They can get a job or get fired, they can join groups, they can die. They can have religious beliefs. They’re social in the way humans are. They interact with each other in social networks. They learn from each other, react to each other and to the environment as a whole.”
Hold on. Agent's are cognitively complex? That's scary, isn't it? And this is a very strange situation we find ourselves in, isn't it? Agents. Simulations. Viruses. Sentinels. Didn't they try and block out the sun? Ahem. Bill Gates. And I've read that originally the script didn't have humanity as batteries, but instead used humans as their RAM. In other words, we we're used for our brains ability to think. More on this in an upcoming post. Just think about it for now.

Final Thoughts

The what if men and the people machine. They model society and we see what they want us to see. Kind of like the model in the Matrix wearing the red dress. We're too busy looking for danger everywhere but where we should look. And that's a mistake. This is why we can't dismiss anything. We have to question everything.
In the previous post I said that it was called the Sentinel World Simulation. I found the article. I made a mistake. It's called the Sentient World Simulation. Words matter. Always. But I still don't think my mistake alters what's going on. We are being steered by an unseen group. And this is why China + Russia + USA are heading towards a cliff. He who controls AI controls humanity. But who controls who?
More soon.
submitted by biggreekgeek to conspiracy [link] [comments]

Flatten the Curve. Part 75. Let's talk once more about Aliens. And training for Underground Warfare. And Riot Control. And unexplained drones. And did you know that they had reported the smell of sulfur with UFO's? Real or Fake, this may just be in our New Normal future.

Previous Post Here
Welcome back earthlings. Let's take another look at Terra Firma and our present chances of First Contact, shall we?

Flatten the Curve

I first started writing this series because I noticed inconsistencies and over looked current events, namely, the world wide reports of a distinct sulfur smell around the world. These reports aren't easy to find in search engines, and it took me a number of weeks before I convinced myself that something was happening worldwide that was being kept hidden from us. Flatten the Curve post on sulfur. Source Here
Back then I became convinced that this was part of an ELE that we were going to face in the future. And while the odds remain firmly with that explanation, another possibility has entered into the scenario. What's the possibility?Whelp, hold on to your tinfoil hats;

UFO's

Hold up, back up, this isn't normal New Normal stuff. And you're right, it isn't. Not at all. And trust me, even I'm in disbelief over what I've seen. But maybe I shouldn't have been.
Why?
Because of some strangeness that happened after the first sulfur post. Because after that post, I received a few strange comments or private messages. I can't remember which it was, but I think it was comments, so if you're interested to verify, go back and check (if those comments are still up, because I had an unusually high number of deleted comments back then, and maybe I still do, but I don't know and I don't care.) So what were the comments about? They pointed out to me that a high number of UFO sightings also happened to coincide with the smell of sulfur. Which I thought was nuts. I had read books about UFO sightings as a little kid. A lot of books. And I didn't remember reading that once. And I thought that I would have.

I was wrong

Now, I don't know who sent me that first UFO and sulfur hint. But I will say, that was strange. Very strange. And I should have looked into it. But I didn't. Why? Because that wasn't what I thought was happening, that's why. Despite the tic tac video. And then that report came out about the not of this world material. And I ignored it. And then I started seeing more and more UFO reports, and I finally decided to search sulfur + UFO, and surprise, surprise, nothing. So I kept searching, and guess what, it was exactly like my experience trying to find the sulfur reports; the info is there, but you have to dig to find it.
Now I don't have a lot of information, mainly because there are more pressing issues to write about, but I will keep looking in my spare time. So for now, let's start at the sulfur reports.
(Seriously, I'm still wondering what on earth has happened to Normal, because I'm not a fan of this movie script)

Aliens Stink Like Uranus

Get it? Becaue Uranus has hydrogen sulfide...
FalconLake Then there was the smell. "When I walked into the bedroom there was a huge stink in the room, like a real horrible aroma of sulphur and burnt motor. It was all around and it was coming out of his pores. It was bad," said Michalak, who co-authored the book When They Appeared with Winnipeg UFO researcher Chris Rutkowski. Believing it to be a secret U.S.military experimental craft, Stefan sat back and sketched it over the next half hour. Then he decided to approach, later recalling the warm air and smell of sulphur as he got closer, as well as a whirring sound of motors and a hissing of air. Source Here
Did you notice the sulfur smell? Now let's go on and take another look at the East coast of Canada.
Then there was Shag Harbor Source Here
And now onto Cussac.
On Aug. 29, 1967, a 13-year-old boy and his 9-year-old sister told local police they were watching cows in a field and saw "four small black beings about 47 inches tall" who appeared to rise in the air and enter "a round spaceship, about 15 feet in diameter" that was hovering over the field. The police noted "sulfur odor and the dried grass" at the place where the sphere was alleged to have taken off. Source Here
And West Virginia.
On a steep hillside, a bevy of youngsters drawn away from a game of sandlot football, along with some adults, were shaken out of their shoes by the spectacle of a 12-foot, metallic object that emanated a pungent odor of sulfur and made sounds that reminded one witness of bacon sizzling in a fry pan. Source Here
And the last one is perhaps the strangest.
Bender’s message did not go over well. His rooms continued to fill with the smell of sulphur and he was telepathically ordered to cease delving into matters that were not his concern. A yellow mist gathered in the attic. Undeterred, Bender announced that the July issue of Space Review would hold a “startling revelation.” It never appeared in print. In July 1953 Albert Bender was visited at his home by three men. Bender stated “All of them were dressed in black clothes. They looked like clergymen but wore hats similar to [the]Homburg style.” The notorious Men In Black, always in threes, made it clear to Bender that he was to immediately halt all UFO work. They communicated telepathically: “Stop publishing.” Before departing, the MIB confiscated copies of Space Review and in their wake a yellow fog materialized in the upstairs rooms of 784 Broad Street. Again, the vile odor of sulphur wafted through the attic. Unnerved by their other-worldly presence Albert shuddered that he was “scared to death” and was unable to eat for days. The 32 year-old timekeeper would be the recipient of repeated MIB visits. The telepathic messages, headaches, his being stalked, and of course the surreal warnings by authoritarians in black suits, compelled Albert to shut down the International Flying Saucer Bureau. A year and a half after founding the IFSB the final issue of Space Review was released in October, 1953. It included a cryptic message, and warning: “The mystery of the flying saucers is no longer a mystery. The source is already known but any information about this is being withheld by orders from a higher source. We would like to print the full story in Space Review but because of the nature of the information we have been advised in the negative. We advise those engaged in saucer work to be very cautious. Source Here
Out of this admittedly small collection, there are a couple points that I noticed. They all happened years ago, and a couple incidents are near water. Now that's not a big deal, and because of my limited examples, I can't make a big deal out of it. But.

Do we have Extraterrestrials under water?

The Tic Tac video. That sure got...barely any attention. Strange, right? Almost like everyone is being conditioned to accept news like that as normal. As though our natural born instincts are being dulled. Because real or not, come on, this is a modern day spotting a sabretooth tiger moment, and we don't think it's a big enough declaration to have it on our radar? Really? Ok. Sure. But. If very few people are talking about that incident, they are really not talking about something else Farvor said.
“They reverse the winch and the diver’s thinking, ‘What the hell is going on?’ And all of a sudden he said the torpedo just got sucked down underwater, and the object just descended back down into the depths. They never recovered it.” The helicopter pilot swears the torpedo didn’t sink, per Fravor—and that pilot even told the Times about the incident back in 2017, but the paper never reported it. We’re guessing the editors would reconsider today. As the pilot picked up the BQM, he was apparently at a loss for words. “He’s looking at this thing going, ‘What the hell is that?’ And then it just goes back down underwater. Once they pull the kid and the BQM out of the water, this object descends back into the depths.” One dark mass coming up from the depths is weird enough. Two is officially cause for concern. A few months later, the helicopter pilot saw the exact same thing.
“He’s out picking up a torpedo, they hook the diver up on the winch, and as they’re lowering him down, he sees this big mass. He goes, ‘It’s not a submarine’. He’s seen submarines before. Once you’ve seen a submarine you can’t confuse it with something else. This big object, kind of circular, is coming up from the depths and he starts screaming through the intercom system to tell them to pull the diver up, and the diver’s only a few feet from the water. Source Here
It's a little more common knowledge now, but it definitely wasn't back then. And if we go over to the Russians (apparently, thanks New Normal Fake News for the constant barrage of disinformation) and what they released.
2009 • Russian Navy Declassifies Cold War Close Encounters. Great catch by Phil Ewing at Navy Times‘ Scoop Deck blog: the Russian navy has just declassified its records of Cold War UFO sightings. Turns out “50 percent of UFO encounters are connected with oceans. Fifteen [percent] more — with lakes. So UFOs tend to stick to the water,” one Russian officer explained. Source Here
So now we have Russia and the USA reporting about UFO sightings. And the wall fell just a few short years after Gorbachev and Reagan decided to talk about UFO's and world peace in 1985. So now let's go back to 1984.
Conspiracy theorists believe that the closing ceremony from the 1984 Olympic Games ‘prepared the world for an alien invasion’ The bizarre closing ceremony at the Los Angeles Games raised eyebrows at the time, but alien enthusiasts still claim that the Olympic event had a more sinister purpose. Source Here
Whelp. What. Was. That? Seriously? And then we had the music from Space Odyssey 2001 playing. Kind of coincidental with all of our current Monoliths and signals from Jupiter, isn't it? Flatten the Curve. Part [Source Here]( And here's the crazy aspect, I found that 1984 Olympics clip after noticing our current events invoking themes from the movie.
1984 NY Times • The public hearing was plodding along routinely at the Town Hall one night last month. ''All of a sudden, a cop burst in yelling: 'The U.F.O.'s here! The U.F.O.'s here!' '' said Peter A. Brandenberg, a 43-year-old real-estate developer. ''Everyone jumped up and jolted out. We went flying down the stairs to see this thing, just staring at it.'' On a night before that, William A. Pollard was driving along Interstate 84 near Brewster. 'Whoa! Wait a Minute Here' ''My neighbors said they had seen something,'' said Mr. Pollard, 29, the manager of an automobile service center. ''I said, 'Yeah, yeah, yeah.' I never believed in that stuff. But off in a field I saw this gigantic triangle with lights, about 30 feet off the ground - hovering. Then it turned off its lights and shot straight up - straight up. That's when I said, 'Whoa! Wait a minute here.' '' Throughout northern Westchester County, Dutchess and Putnam Counties and western Connecticut this summer, thousands of residents have reported strange objects in the sky - each usually in a V-shape or a circle, about the size of a football field, absolutely noiseless and outlined in brilliant lights of white, red or green. Source Here
And there are more prominent UFO reports in 1984. So let's get this straight. We have major sightings in 1984 and then we have a UFO show at the 1984 Olympics. Ok. But then we have Jimmy Carter in 1976.
During the 1976 presidential campaign, Carter pledged that, if elected, he would encourage the government to make public “every piece of information” about UFOs. Once in office, however, he said releasing some of this information could have adverse “defense implications” and pose a threat to national security. Source Here
And then next year we have Close Encounters of the Third Kind in 1977. And then Spielberg goes on to direct ET in 1982. My point? There seems to be a previous attempt to make Aliens look pretty benign and altruistic. That was followed up by the Summer Olympics UFO show, which honestly makes no sense at all. In the slightest. Not back then. Because unlike now, only crackpots and Conspiracy theorists believed in Aliens. So why the show? Was this a coordinated attempt to get us ready or to deceive us, because I find it hard to believe that the President of the United States in 1985 just blurted out UFO in 1985 as a metaphor.
Let's keep digging and see if we can find more water.

Missing 411

What is that doing in here when we're talking about UFO's? Good question, let me show you.
They are clustered in certain areas, particularly around bodies of water and in national parks. If the people are found alive, they often have memory loss. If they are found dead, the cause of death is hard to determine. The people are sometimes found in an area it seems they could not have reached by foot, or they are found in a location that has already been thoroughly searched. Source Here
Memory loss. Bodies of water. The authorities don't keep a tally of missing people. Dive into it, because something strange is going on, and ot sounds just like an alien abduction would. Are the 411 cases dealing with extraterrestrial incidents? Food for thought, because we're about to go off the deep end. Ready?

Enders Game and the Three Body Problem

A while back I shared a photo of Rita Wilson that caught my attention. It was a picture of her reading, Enders Game. Source Here
And Enders game just so happens to be a novel about humanity waging a war with Aliens. And the picture was oddly getting a lot of traction, HEY LOOK AT THIS PICTURE!
Now let's go into the Dark Forest.
What are some of those books? It’s interesting, the stuff I read just to escape ends up being a mix of things — some science fiction. For a while, there was a three-volume science-fiction novel, the “Three-Body Problem” series — Oh, Liu Cixin, who won the Hugo Award. — which was just wildly imaginative, really interesting. It wasn’t so much sort of character studies as it was just this sweeping — It’s really about the fate of the universe. Exactly. The scope of it was immense. So that was fun to read, partly because my day-to-day problems with Congress seem fairly petty — not something to worry about. Aliens are about to invade. [Laughter] Source Here
When Aliens are about to invade. Ha. Ha. Ha. Pretty funny. Right. But then it gets stranger, because it's not just Obama, but our other favorite alien, Mark Zuckerberg.

When Obama and Zuckerberg are your fan boys: On Cixin Liu’s ‘Remembrance of Earth’s Past’ Trilogy

In his Remembrance of Earth’s Past series, Liu doesn’t value this idea enough to even pay it lip service. Organizing earth for a centuries-long project of developing the tools to fight a coming invasion is, in his telling, work exclusively reserved for large planning committees of technical experts given global mandates and staggering resources. In short, it’s a job only properly suited for the nascent technocratic class that has held increasing sway in our world in the last ~30–40 years (and which Liu himself, as a computer engineer in China, is tacitly a part of). The humanity presented within these books is a humanity of government conferences, scientific laboratories and U.N. resolutions. It’s a humanity that is contained and constrained utterly within a world of technical and logistical problem solving. In short, the humanity presented in these books is purely that of a technocratic elite.We live in an age in which the gap between those with technical skills and those without is widening. Our ideas of affluence and upward mobility are increasingly colored not simply by who possesses wealth, but also by who possesses specific types of knowledge and skills. Cixin Liu has written a remarkable science fiction epic which also, perhaps unknowingly, serves as a warning. A world in which a globally empowered technocratic class controls everything is a world that can achieve remarkable outcomes. But it is, by its very nature, a sterile world; one in which the overwhelming majority of human life and experience is a mere afterthought in a plenary session. Source Here
Take note of two things; The title of the series and the theme of the Technocrats saving humanity.
Now. Here are some Stanger Things that I've noticed.
One • Tom and Rita Wilson, Zuckerbuffon, and Obama love to have their picture taken in the water. As in, they we're all prominently featured recently. Zuckerberg
Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson
Obama
Could they all just be innocent photos. Yes. Are they? More than likely, yes. But, what if they're signals for people who understand? After all, you don't want that kind of information written down, do you? But why Tom Hanks? Fracked if I know! But his appearance in all this crap just doesn't stop. Now he's appearing with Biden at the inauguration? Really? I mean Zuckerberg looks alien, so maybe Tom is too! Just joking (I think). I honestly have no idea why the Bosom Buddy is right into this New Normal.
But.
Darkforest is a computer go program developed by Facebook, based on deep learning techniques using a convolutional neural network. Its updated version Darkfores2 combines the techniques of its predecessor with Monte Carlo tree search. The MCTS effectively takes tree search methods commonly seen in computer chess programs and randomizes them. With the update, the system is known as Darkfmcts3. Source Here
Ok. We know that Zuckerdork loves the novel. Sure. But he loves it enough to name his AI computer after the book? Words matter. A lot. And while this is all just probably a coincidence, what if it isn't? All the reports about underwater objects. All the photos of the three of them in the ocean. Facebook’s AI being called the Dark Forest. The monoliths that are striking me as more than a natural occurrence. The UFO around the sun during the 2012 solar flare? The sudden surge to protect the energy grid? The sulfur reports and the early reports of smell around UFO activity? All the recent reports about drones being casually dismissed as nothing.
Observations of mysterious drones spotted in northeastern Colorado and western Nebraska were first reported in December 2019.[1] The drones were described as having blinking lights and a wingspan of about six feet (1.8 m). According to the Denver Post, the drones flew in groups of six to 10 and were usually seen between 7 and 10 pm. The sheriff of Phillips County, Colorado described the formation as "a grid search" and stated that the size and number of drones makes it unlikely that they are being operated by hobbyists. One witness in Palisade, Nebraska counted 19 drones at one time, some hovering and others flying in formations in small groups. Source Here
Look. Something is going on these days. Something big. What? Now that's the big question, isn’t it?
Could all the posturing about war be about moving military units around? What about the environmental catastrophe they keep moving closer, not to mention the amount of prominent scientists who claim the numbers aren't adding up for them, including Freeman Dyson.
Freeman Dyson was a physics professor known for his work in the area of electrodynamics. Dyson formerly worked as a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. He passed away at 96 years old in February 2020. According to Dyson's profile at the Institute for Advanced Study, “His most useful contribution to science was the unification of the three versions of quantum electrodynamics invented by Feynman, Schwinger and Tomonaga. Cornell University made him a professor without bothering about his lack of Ph.D.” Source Here
You know, the guy who came up with the concept of the Dyson sphere.
So if the numbers aren't adding up, but the military is making operational strategy changes to cope with abrupt climate change, something is obviously happening, isn't it? The military doesn't just institute changes for nothing. So is the environment being manipulated bu outside entities? Is that why they're suddenly worried about the power grid?
And what about the by now obvious Covid-19 deaths that are predominantly among seniors. Is it to clean out the hospitals for the upcoming encounter? Before you say no, just remember that a no regrets strategy was actually proposed in a military scenario paper on abrupt climate change.
Here's the definition:
No-Regrets" Approach: "No-regrets" actions are actions by households, communities, and local/national/international institutions that can be justified from economic, and social, and environmental perspectives whether natural hazard events or climate change (or other hazards) take place or not. "No-regrets" actions increase resilience, which is the ability of a "system" to deal with different types of hazards in a timely, efficient, and equitable manner. Increasing resilience is the basis for sustainable growth in a world of multiple hazards (see Heltberg, Siegel, Jorgensen, 2009; UNDP, 2010).
If you would like to read the paper, I do have it linked on Flatten the Curve under Peter Schwartz.
Is this what were seeing? A no regrets approach in action in anticipation of first contact? Is this what they mean by the New Normal? Is this why they're trying to establish a one world government? So we can work together to get ready? Is this why there's an overflow of informational leaks like Moloch worshipers, or Russian Fake News, and on and on. Is it to keep us off balance from the real threat? And could they be so advanced that they're attempting to circumvent our progress through manipulating our planet? Is this why we have so many nukes? Is this why they want to weaponize space?
I'm not saying that my running hypothesis has changed, but I am saying that looking at events from a different perspective can only help. And seriously, right now, I would be lying if I didn't admit that I would be relieved if they weren't a bunch of psychopathic greedy AI loving nutjobs. Which I still think they are, because even if Mars Attacks, or we have War of the Worlds, or Independence Day, I'll still have to see them face to face. Why. One word. Deepfake.
So let's consider a few points before I sign off. We have sulfur reports. Early reports linking sulfur to the UFO phenomenon. An increase in UFO reports. The government disclosing incident reports. Warnings about a possible grid failure through cyberattack or solar flare. Abrupt Climate Change. A No Regrets Strategy for Climate Change. A virus that seems to hit those who would be the biggest burden on the health care system. A worldwide hum and Sky Trumpets. The Pentagon commissioning reports about riot control and then funding training into underground warfare. And we have reports about underwater UFO's and older Conspiracy theories about Aliens living underground.
So, real or fake, I don't think we should discount the possibility that something may occur that could just knock the world's perception of reality.
And trust me, I still don't believe this is likely. Why? Well I find it pretty coincidental that H.G. Wells not only wrote War of the Worlds, but he also wrote a book called New World Order. And he also collaborated with Julian S. Huxley, a known eugenics supporter and brother of Aldous Huxley of a Brave New World fame.
Alright, long story short, I'm not saying it's aliens, but it's....yeah. Buckle up and just be ready, because if our New Normal is based on a No Regrets Strategy, our strategy has to become a No Trust Strategy.
Heads up and eyes open. Talk soon.
submitted by biggreekgeek to conspiracy [link] [comments]

Analysis of ARV Experiment on /r/RemoteViewing to Predict 2020 U.S. Election Outcome

Analysis of ARV Experiment on /RemoteViewing to Predict 2020 U.S. Election Outcome
Some of you are aware (some frustratingly aware) that since late 2019 I posted several ARV targets in /remoteviewing to predict the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Election. I’ve completed my analysis of the data, the purpose of which was not so much to predict the outcome (which we did anyway), but also to look at how ARV prediction data lined up with the eventual result.
The TL;DR is that early predictions were of moderate strength, but changed from favoring the incumbent at first to a shift for the challenger towards November 3. This was a bit as expected if you subscribe to any of the theories that say we have free will and the future isn’t set in stone. Also useful is that this experiment suggests that applying an economic term called discounting to ARV data may help prevent people from putting too much faith in early, inaccurate predictions.
The real highlight here is that after giving each prediction points, then adjusting those points, the results follow closely with data from UK gambling website Betfair (published by Newsweek) on the odds they were giving each candidate over the last year. Like, very closely – only one prediction out of seven was off. But, this is just a preliminary study of the concept. More research is needed. And more data.

https://preview.redd.it/vcs5y71i57561.png?width=945&format=png&auto=webp&s=6f31ddf266c29fb71f1fd9f92a19b06c541eefcb
For those that want to get super into the weeds on this, I have a 15-page research paper available here for those who want to have a read. I’ll warn you, it’s some detailed stuff and isn’t for everyone. But if the thought of applying economic analysis to ARV data sounds like a fun way to spend 20 minutes (there’s graphs!) then feel free.
I also want to thank both the /RemoteViewing community and in particular the 18 users who provided session data: u/Bondibitch, BadWolfPikey, -burgers, Dudley_Dawg, ebell8, FluffyLlamaPants, FuckyouImaUnicorn, GlassCloched, icylana, Mark_Shubin, Mockingbirdmoon, MultipleFutures, NahSense, nandxnor, NoodleBoiDonkey, Syiduk, Tomatopotatotomato, Woo-d-woo
This experiment relied on the time and effort of others, and would not be possible without you. I also want to thank fellow moderators /nykotar and /GrinSpickett for their continued, constant support of the /RemoteViewing community and for helping standardize target posting rules so that an experiment like this can take place. Sincere thanks to each and every one of you!
This revision comes after receiving feedback from Jon Knowles and Debra Katz. Many thanks to them for their critical look at this experiment, and guiding comments and questions. It ended up leading to a better overall analysis, for which I am sincerely grateful.
If you have questions on the research or data, feel free to post them here.

Edit: a space
submitted by Frankandfriends to remoteviewing [link] [comments]

Bernie Blindness Megathread

Bernie Blindness Album

Included at the bottom of this post is a list of helpful articles explaining/documenting the anti-Bernie bias in the media. If you have articles you think should be added to this, please reply to this post!

This sub is meant to document the mainstream media's intentional ignoring, down-playing and/or misrepresentation of Bernie Sanders and his campaign. This also includes the media's manufacturing of dissent against Bernie Sanders combined with the manufacturing of consent for other candidates. At the top of this post is an album of some of the more egregious examples (updated periodically). Most of these images are sourced.
Thank you everyone for your continued effort in documenting the media's blatant bias against Bernie. With your help, this sub will continue to open more people's eyes to the systemic corruption and elitism that plagues the American mainstream media. In the US, 6 corporations control 90% of the media. These 6 corporations care about one thing: money. Bernie is a threat to their astronomical wealth. As the primaries draw closer the concentrated effort to manufacture consent for ANYBODY BUT Bernie Sanders will ramp up. Even when Bernie wins the nomination, they won't stop, because the reality of the situation is the 1% would much rather have 4 more years of anyone--even Trump. So keep spreading the word and keep questioning the media's motives/bias.
Stay informed everyone!
Please bear in mind that these articles below cover some instances of media bias. They are not the actual anti-Bernie biased articles, but they do provide citation of that. If I were to provide all the instances of media bias against Sanders, the list would be far longer than this, but you can take a look at the picture album above and also look at some of the top posts of this sub for more examples of MSM bias against Bernie.

Helpful articles explaining/documenting the anti-Bernie bias in the MSM:
Campaign 2020 Media Dashboard
The Corporate Media Convinced Millions That Bernie Was “Unelectable”
Bernie Sanders versus the “corporate media,” explained
“Bernie Blackout: The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” (2020)
Inside the Corporate Media’s ‘Blackout’ of Bernie Sanders’ 2020 Presidential Campaign
Author explains how ‘corporate America is pushing back against Sanders’
As Long As Mass Media Propaganda Exists, Democracy Is A Sham
Tired of Corporate Propaganda? Progressive Media Outlets Join Forces for Super Tuesday Coverage
There is hard data that shows "Bernie Bros" are a myth
New analysis proves attacks on Sanders supporters are part of establishment smear campaign
Finally, Can We All Agree? Everything We Were Told About Bernie Sanders Was Wrong
Corporate Media Are the Real ‘Sanders Attack Machine’
N.H. voter: I voted for Sanders because of media's ‘cynical’ coverage of him
The media keep falling in love — with anybody but Bernie Sanders
Coverage of Bernie Sanders suffers from a lack of imagination
How Pundits Manipulate Math to Dismiss Sanders
The Orwellian Assault on Bernie Sanders
How an Anti-Sexist Candidate Got Smeared as Sexist
Mainstream Media Are Obsessed With Comparing Bernie to Trump
It’s Media—Not Bernie Sanders—That Have an Antisemitism Problem
Brace Yourself Sanders Supporters, It’s Going to Get Ugly
Tonight’s Democratic Debate Co-Moderator Has a Longstanding Anti-Bernie Bias
Corporate Media Equate Sanders to Trump—Because for Them, Sanders Is the Bigger Threat
The Media Can't Face Its Own Corporate Influence
The Night the Media Realized Bernie Could Win - A serious candidacy brought out the absurd questions.
Anti-Sanders Media Bias Rears its Ugly Head Again in 2020 Race
The Corporate Media’s War Against Bernie Sanders Is Very Real
Corporate Media Bias Against Sanders Is Structural, Not a Conspiracy
Sanders campaign manager accuses journalists of discounting Bernie's seriousness
The Media Can Take Bernie Sanders a Little Seriously, as a Treat
The “Bernie Blackout” Is in Effect — and It Could Help Sanders Win
#Bernieblackout: The Media Isn’t Even Hiding Its Anti-Bernie Bias Anymore
Reporting on Medicare for All Makes Media Forget How Math Works
Manufacturing Dissent: The Media’s Bias Against Bernie Sanders
Why Bernie Sanders Is Absolutely Correct About the Washington Post—and Corporate Media Overall
Bernie Sanders versus the “corporate media,” explained
The pundit class continues to misunderstand Bernie Sanders – and it shows
Bernie is under-covered on TV relative to polling
Grassroots Candidates Are Inherently Inviable to Mainstream Media Outlets
How The Primary Is Being Rigged Against Bernie (Again)
Bernie Is Right to Go After Jeff Bezos and the Washington Post
Bernie Sanders Is the Most Progressive Politician in the 2020 Race. Why Aren’t More People Talking About Him?
Propagandists Cry About Bernie’s Online Base Because It’s Effective, Not Because It’s Mean
By Trying to Silence Sanders, the Corporate Media Delegitimize Themselves
The Kids Still Love Bernie
MSNBC bias:
Don’t Tell Cable Pundits That Bernie Sanders Is Leading Nationally Among Black Voters
MSNBC in 'Full-Blown Freakout' Mode as Bernie Sanders Cements Status as Democratic Frontrunner
Don’t Tell Cable Pundits That Bernie Sanders Is Leading Nationally Among Black Voters
Bernie Sanders’ media critics and opponents are suddenly focusing their attacks on the new frontrunner
MSNBC's Chris Matthews Faces Calls To Resign After Comparing Sanders' Nevada Victory To Nazi Germany's Defeat Of France
Chris Matthews faces calls for resignation after comparing Sanders victory to Nazi invasion
James Carville Says People Who Think Bernie Will Beat Trump Are as ‘Stupid’ as Climate Deniers
James Carville Says Media Isn’t Telling Voters ‘Risks’ of Bernie Sanders Victory
“We’re losing our damn minds”: James Carville unloads on the Democratic Party
A ‘Scared to Death’ James Carville Sounds Alarms for Democratic Field: ‘Do We Want to Be an Ideological Cult?’
MSNBC Does Not Merely Permit Fabrications Against Democratic Party Critics. It Encourages and Rewards Them.
Fox Has Been “More Fair”: Why Bernie’s Team Has Had It With MSNBC
Bernie Sanders Has an MSNBC Problem
Why Does Mainstream Media Keep Attacking Bernie Sanders as He Wins?
MSNBC's Chuck Todd under fire for reciting quote comparing Sanders supporters to Nazis
Let's Just Say It: Chris Matthews Hates Bernie Sanders
'This Is Why No One Trusts the Media': MSNBC Slammed for Featuring 'Body Language Expert' Who Calls Sanders a Liar
MSNBC Yet Again Broadcasts Blatant Lies, This Time About Bernie Sanders’s Opening Speech, and Refuses to Correct Them
MSNBC Is the Most Influential Network Among Liberals—And It’s Ignoring Bernie Sanders
MSNBC’s Anti-Sanders Bias Is Getting Truly Ridiculous
MSNBC’s Anti-Sanders Bias Makes It Forget How to Do Math
MSNBC Misreports Data, Shortchanges Bernie Sanders
MSNBC’s Ridiculous War on Bernie Sanders
Want More Proof of Corporate Media’s Anti-Bernie Bias? Look at MSNBC’s Democratic Debate.
MSNBC Cuts Away From Bernie Sanders as He Condemns Trans-Pacific Partnership
Ed Schultz Blames MSNBC Firing on His Support for Bernie Sanders
Why They Hate Bernie
CNN bias:
CNN’s Coverage of Sanders Was 3X More Negative Than Biden Following Their Big Primary Wins
The Plutocracy Strikes Back: CNN Compares Bernie Sanders to Coronavirus
At the Iowa Debate, Bernie Sanders’s Most Vociferous Opponent Was CNN
'CNN Is Truly a Terrible Influence on This Country': Democratic Debate Moderators Pilloried for Centrist Talking Points and Anti-Sanders Bias
'Bernie Blackout' Strikes Again? Despite Iowa Poll Average Showing Sanders in Solid 2nd, CNN Uses Old Poll to Show Him in 4th
CNN accused of manipulating Bernie Sanders footage to make him look unwell
Krystal Ball Explains to CNN That Bernie Sanders Popular 'Precisely Because DC Hates Him'
Media Stupidity Is Uniting Left and Right
CNN’s shameful treatment of Bernie Sanders
Did CNN Stack the Audience Against Bernie Sanders at His Town Hall?
CNN Has It In for Bernie
CNN is Trash
NYT bias:
Why the Democrats Should Back Bernie Sanders: And Why They Won’t, If They Can Possibly Help It
Democrats’ Quandary: What To Do About Bernie?
Bernie Sanders Has the Momentum
What David Brooks gets wrong about Bernie Sanders
The New York Times Has It in for Bernie Sanders
Meet Sydney Ember, the New York Times’ Senior Anti-Bernie Correspondent
‘The New York Times’ vs. Bernie
New York Times: Bernie Sanders' plan to fight climate emergency is too ambitious, slightly Trumpy
Hey, New York Times, cough up the screenshots or pipe down
​WaPo bias:
The Washington Post’s Well-Documented Bias Against Bernie Sanders
The Campaign Press: Members of the 10 Percent, Reporting for the One Percent
The Washington Post’s War on Bernie Continues
The Washington Post’s Latest Fact Check of Bernie Sanders Is Really Something
If You're Looking for Evidence of WaPo Media Bias Against Bernie Sanders, Here It Is
NYmag bias:
Jonathan Chait Is Wrong About Everything, Including Bernie’s Electability
​Politico bias:
Politico’s ‘cheap’ shot at Bernie Sanders
NPR bias:
MSM Smears Sanders For Saying MSM Smears Sanders
CBS bias:
Democratic debate: CBS, Bloomberg draw jeers for ad buy, ‘stacked’ audience
ABC bias:
Whoopi Goldberg Spars With Bernie Sanders: ‘Why Are You Still in the Race?’
ABC News Has Covered Sanders for Only Seven Minutes in 2019
Meghan McCain Rips Into Bernie Bros Ahead of Super Tuesday: ‘The Dirtiest Thugs I’ve Ever Seen on Social Media’
'The View's' Sunny Hostin says Bernie Sanders has to be 'challenged on a lot of his positions'
FiveThirtyEight bias:
Has There Been A Bernie Sanders Blackout?
Bernie Sanders’ Supporters Speak Out Against Nate Silver ‘Residue’ Tweet
Nate Silver and the Pitfalls of the Corporate Pundit Class
Vox (and NYT) bias:
Ezra Klein and Paul Krugman both face-planted in their Bernie Sanders takedowns
Salon, The Atlantic and Bloomberg bias:
Democrats’ Tactic of Accusing Critics of Kremlin Allegiance Has Long, Ugly History in U.S.
The Seven Stages of Establishment Backlash: Corbyn/Sanders Edition
Axios and Apple News (NYT owned) bias:
Axios issues apology after incorrectly reporting Sanders suspended his 2020 campaign
More Manufacturing Consent:
What Media Like Best About Elizabeth Warren: She’s Not Bernie Sanders
Can Debate Moderators Stop Parroting GOP Talking Points?
Memo to mainstream journalists: Can the phony outrage; Bernie is right about bias
The Mainstream Media’s Palace Guard
The Mass Media Reality
Bernie fighting back:
The Sanders Campaign Is Fighting Back Against Biased Media Coverage
'Gave Me Goosebumps': Praise for Independent Video That Captures Side of Bernie Sanders Corporate Media Ignores
As Examples Mount, Sanders Campaign Accuses Corporate Media of 'Deliberate Attempt to Erase Bernie'
Sanders team accuses media of ignoring 'surge' in polls
Media bias in 2015/2016:
Clinton Ally Attacks Sanders on Socialism
WashPo's Obvious Bias: 16 Negative Stories About Bernie Sanders Published in Just 16 Hours
Where’s Bernie? Media Ignores Sanders Though He’s More Popular Than Trump
CNN accused of media bias against Bernie Sanders after focusing too much on super delegates
For Meet the Press, Bernie Sanders Is He Who Must Not Be Named
2016 Presidential Media Blackouts: Not Just Conspiracy
Sanders: Trump coverage ‘an indictment of the media’
The Discourse Suffers When Trump Gets 23 Times As Much Coverage as Sanders
ABC World News Tonight Has Devoted Less Than One Minute To Bernie Sanders'
Bernie Don’t Get No Respect From Media
Proof That The New York Times Isn’t Feeling the Bern
Bernie Sanders: “I Was Stunned” by Corporate Media Blackout During Democratic Primary
The New York Times, bias and Hillary Clinton
The Myth That Sanders Hasn’t Been Criticized Won’t Go Away
The “Bernie Bros” Narrative: a Cheap Campaign Tactic Masquerading as Journalism and Social Activism
How was the election rigged? (This section is still under construction)
2015/2016
https://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/cnn-accused-of-media-bias-against-bernie-sanders-after-focusing-too-much-on-super-delegates-a7067446.html
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.html
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-3082-d20b-a1fc-b3e3368b0000
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/16/clinton-does-best-where-voting-machines-flunk-hacking-tests-hillary-clinton-vs-bernie-sanders-election-fraud-allegations/
https://www.blackagendareport.com/2016-revisited-electronic-balloting-favored-clinton-paper-balloting-sanders
https://api.gdeltproject.org/api/v2/campaign2020/campaign2020?dm=rawdem&ts=custom&sd=20191001&ed=20191231
https://www.reddit.com/conspiracy/comments/ehxaeb/odds_hillary_beat_bernie_in_california_without/
https://web.archive.org/web/20160618225738/http://alexanderhiggins.com/stanford-berkley-study-1-77-billion-chance-hillary-won-primary-without-widespread-election-fraud/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6J1ecILnk3UUy1KZ2FUT29iQ1E/view?pref=2&pli=1
https://democracydetective.wordpress.com/report-2016-rigging/
https://www.reddit.com/conspiracy/comments/e3p8p1/a_reminder_that_the_dnc_and_the_mainstream_media/f971t8
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/2/16599036/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-sanders
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/796222841612042240?lang=en
https://decisiondata.org/news/political-media-blackouts-president-2016/
https://www.amazon.com/77-Billion-One-Election-Fraud/dp/1539309371
https://tdmsresearch.com/2016/07/26/exit-polls-and-computer-vote-counts/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5O9I4XJdSISNzJyaWIxaWpZWnM/view
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqRNnIMDkUY
https://youtu.be/w5llLIKM9Yc
2019/2020
https://tdmsresearch.com/2020/03/04/massachusetts-2020-democratic-party-primary/
https://www.reddit.com/conspiracy/comments/ez0fpa_reminder_that_dnc_colluded_against_bernie_in/fgkev7m/
https://i.redd.it/avqqe5mz30f41.png
https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-myth-of-incompetence-dnc-scandals-are-a-feature-not-a-bug-4f264352d4f7
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2020/07/09/as-long-as-mass-media-propaganda-exists-democracy-is-a-sham/
https://theintercept.com/2020/03/01/south-carolina-results-biden-black-vote-sanders-msnbc/
https://inthesetimes.com/features/msnbc-bernie-sanders-coverage-democratic-primary-media-analysis.html
https://therealnews.com/stories/corporate-media-bias-against-sanders-is-structural-not-a-conspiracy
https://jacobinmag.com/2020/07/bernie-sanders-joe-biden-democratic-primary
https://www.reddit.com/Political_Revolution/comments/fihmnx/the_discrepancies_between_primary_exit_polls_and/
https://www.reddit.com/WayOfTheBern/comments/fdkad4/kyle_kulinski_theres_a_large_discrepancy_between/
https://www.reddit.com/WayOfTheBern/comments/fi4wqj/election_fraud/
https://progressivelineup2020.com/2020/03/08/dear-bernie-sanders-your-campaign-must-immediately-file-a-federal-lawsuit-seeking-court-intervention-investigation-and-oversight-of-the-2020-democrat-primary/
https://www.nationofchange.org/2020/03/13/is-the-dnc-cheating-again/
https://twitter.com/DRstweets/status/1288991075667910657?s=09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWoSOh7CbLA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mObfi1Y5Rmo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkHRQ5GbAH0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9KthQ0vhz0
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/us/politics/bernie-sanders-democratic-party.html
https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/1141385420602859520?lang=en
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/31/dnc-superdelegates-110083
https://apnews.com/4788e8a658d7934e38a389746a7c58c5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5KjPVICv6I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeaD4mnu2SY
https://www.salon.com/2019/08/26/twitter-sleuths-uncover-an-anti-bernie-conspiracy-infuriating-the-pundit-class/
https://www.vox.com/2019/4/19/18311253/bernie-sanders-clinton-center-american-progress-tanden
https://www.businessinsider.com/iowa-democratic-caucus-tech-issues-2020-2
https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2020-02-04/clinton-campaign-vets-behind-2020-iowa-caucus-app-snafu
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/iowa-caucus-results-shadow-hillary-clinton-us-election-2020-bernie-sanders-a9317506.html
https://inthesetimes.com/article/22354/cnn-bernie-sanders-joe-biden-media-spin-candidates-negative-mentions
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/biden-won-super-tuesday-because-he-won-over-voters-who-decided-late/
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/super-tuesday-exit-polls-nearly-three-ten-voters-decided-last-n1148541
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/looking-obama-s-hidden-hand-candidate-coalescing-around-biden-n1147471
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/02/us/politics/pete-buttigieg-joe-biden-endorsement.html
https://www.wsj.com/articles/moderate-democrats-consolidate-around-biden-ahead-of-super-tuesday-11583180117
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8220051/Barack-Obama-reportedly-convinced-Bernie-Sanders-drop-Democratic-primary.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/did-obama-encourage-buttigieg-and-klobuchar-to-endorse-biden/ar-BB10LvDj
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/02/us/politics/bernie-sanders-democratic-party.html
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/09/barack-obama-joe-biden-2020-campaign-178115
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/472348-krystal-ball-rips-report-saying-obama-would-intervene-to-stop-sanders
https://mobile.twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/1330658930100461569
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58_Cu8MpB2s
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/12/iowa-caucus-dnc-report-444649
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqOtq45csX4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT6LS9mHckQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWVYbiIm0JA&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfRT7rs2Ea4&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwQUC7Xkusc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brYvlHgi8O4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XedDb-xFh9s&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afXxk2xJ908
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u07QsFL8ucE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQe7nF12lgA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkwufBRD-t8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INv63dd5ypo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPgPF20MLU0&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqlTPUn4nXI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEBnY3PJrR4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWoSOh7CbLA&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwQUC7Xkusc&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPgPF20MLU0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH3l0oSzeIQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INv63dd5ypo&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u07QsFL8ucE&t
https://jacobinmag.com/2020/12/cornel-west-interview-bernie-black-lives-matter
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DkYL0qv4RR4 (Before Obama sold-out)
https://shareblueastroturf.netlify.app/
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/democratic-bot-network-sally-albright_n_5aa2f548e4b07047bec68023?guccounter=2
https://www.scribd.com/document/356754910/MEDIA-MATTERS-WAR-PLAN-2017
https://medium.com/datadriveninvestobots-for-biden-4f8722786217
https://theintercept.com/2020/07/02/kamala-harris-wikipedia/
https://therealnews.com/corporate-media-bias-against-sanders-is-structural-not-a-conspiracy
https://mobile.twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/1330658930100461569
https://mobile.twitter.com/krystalball/status/1290381499280142336?lang=en
https://youtu.be/-0w_8spt-6c
https://www.reddit.com/WayOfTheBern/comments/hf465t/lets_not_forget_that_super_tuesday_was/
You can read more about it here: A compilation of links/url and explanation as to how these efforts influenced voters and impacted the vote
Climate scientist Will Steffen "The three main challenges to humanity – climate change, the degradation of the biosphere and the growing inequalities between and among countries are just different facets of the same fundamental problem. That problem being the neoliberal economic system..."
submitted by MABfan11 to u/MABfan11 [link] [comments]

I will stand on this hill until I die: my half-substantiated argument for a Poland that doesn’t depress you

I will stand on this hill until I die: my half-substantiated argument for a Poland that doesn’t depress you
Hey guys,
So I’m generally very pleased with the ways in which KR is being currently steered. To put aside arguments about “realism”, “plausibility” etc, I’ve heard sentiments echoed by the team that go something essentially along the lines of “Is there some precedent for this? If so, let’s do it”. And I am in love with this train of thought, because that’s by no means necessarily going to be realistic. Otherwise, Qing China would probably remain a Wu Peifu dictatorship hellhole. Megali would likewise probably not be an option, and the Anderson Doctrine (one of the most underappreciated pieces of content IMO, conquering the Pacific as Australasia is fantastic) would probably be pretty unfeasible given that the Entente have bigger fish to fry. The 2ACW would probably not happen, and neither would the British Revolution. Obviously, these are all good things that we want to keep.
Anyway, despite my feeling that things will be steered the right way for every country, I feel there is one that I worry for that I cannot resist writing about – if not to change the minds of any KR higher-ups, perhaps one hopes to, in fact, simply predict where this country will be headed. That country is, of course…

Yeah you read the title
Poland
Now, once upon a time, Sikorski’s Poland with the later Czartoryski coup was, without a doubt, my favourite thing to do in Kaiserreich. Though its detail is perhaps lacking compared to newer areas such as South America and China, my knowledge of Polish history post-partition and the OTL events that followed for Poland from WWI to our very day gave KRTL Poland’s seizure of Ruthenian, Lithuanian, Austrian & German lands a great sense of vengeance, a real phoenix (or eagle?) rising from the ashes. One which, especially relative to something like Greece forming Byzantium, felt very much believable and more satisfying as a result. And it does leave me desiring one thing: a Poland that doesn’t get dicked over by her mighty powerful neighbours – because boy, if there was any country that deserved some goddamn poetic justice from this period, it would be Poland.
For those who might not be in the know, once upon a time, the great power in the east of Europe was not Russia: no, it was at different points, either Sweden or Poland-Lithuania, something that might surprise someone who would look at Poland in 1936, either KRTL or OTL, or even today. Sadly, geography ended up screwing Poland over, and a combination of gifted enemy kings, military alliances and opportunism from her neighbours of course led the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to being partitioned three times and erased from the face of the earth.
But here’s where things get more interesting, and it’s when we cover events in Congress Poland and Lithuania, as well as what is today western Belarus and Ukraine – there were at least two uprisings by Poles, Lithuanians and Ruthenians (as they were back then, I don’t exactly know when the Ruthenian identity gradually diverged into Belarusian and Ukrainian) championing the old Rzeczpospolita, and to my surprise, and as Augustyn Czartoryski’s bio suggests – his ancestors were prominently involved in both uprisings, the latter of which happened as late as 1863.

Here’s the flag that was used during the latter uprising, for those curious: Poland, Lithuania & Ruthenia being represented. Probably not a possibility for KR’s universe, but fun fact.
Though I know fewer specifics as of the turn of the 20th century, I do know that the Russian Empire as of 1900 was facing serious issues with nationalism, especially in Congress Poland and the surrounding areas.
This was, of course, a weakness that Germany exploited very effectively in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. And if we look to KRTL in 1936, we see that former Ruthenian lands now have their own nation states, and while Poland is once again de jure independent, it’s seriously reduced in size and left as a puppet of Germany. Their new king August IV seems to feel just as unwelcome in his adoptive home as Mindaugas (or Vytautas in the new lore IIRC) does in Lithuania, and it does make me despair at Poland’s new state of affairs. Around a year ago, I had a good chat with Droz and asked if there would be a chance to depose August IV, and while my question couldn’t be answered, I did hear that you wouldn’t have any other option for a king without being puppeted. Furthermore, I can’t possibly say if Belarusians and Ukrainians would wish to be part of this new Poland anyway – sure, they rose up with them in the 19th century, but it seems like Germany has given them a far sweeter offer in the form of their own nation states.
So, does that remove any chance of an expansionist, monarchist Poland? Well, no, but perhaps probably if you put the two of them together. It sounds like whatever king they have is just going to be a figurehead placed there by a power wishing to use Poland for its own means. But let’s go over some reason why they could potentially get claims and maybe even cores on land east of Congress Poland.
Now, while it's debatable that former Ruthenians would be happy being a part of a restored Poland, I can definitely give you a demographic that would be ecstatic to be a part of a new Poland…
Jews
The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth offered, compared to virtually all of Europe, very hospitable conditions for Jews – I’m foggy on the exact details, but take it from a guy who had the great opportunity to visit the Polin Museum last year in Warsaw. Post-Commonwealth, many former Polish Jews found themselves separated in 3 different countries that at best didn't have as good conditions for them as the old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and at worst were downright oppressive - looking at Russia here. This was exacerbated in WWI, when they found themselves fighting and killing one another, so OTL once Poland was restored many former Polish Jews had a restored hope that things might be better for them.
Around the time of 1930s Poland, there were two schools of thought amongst the demographic: one group, promoted particularly by the Yiddish-speaking community, promoted integration and assimilation in this new Poland. The other group promoted reviving Hebrew and creating a Jewish state (i.e Israel). Now OTL, the former kind of view stopped existing (for reasons I'm sure I don't have to explain), whereas in Kaiserreich, a Yiddish-speaking Jewish community who would realistically be very pro-Poland still would very much exist. Furthermore, given that most of the Middle East will likely remain territory of the Ottoman Empire, might this further give support to those who'd prefer to remain in Poland? This is compounded with Józef Piłsudski remaining a prominent figure in Poland around this time, who encouraged a multi-ethnic Poland whose citizens were united by loyalty to the state rather than religion, for example.
Now, while Jews are obviously still a minority, this is still a population of 3,500,000 spread around the area of OTL 1930s Poland, with around 400,000 in OTL Belarus and upwards of 2,000,000 in OTL Ukraine, and IIRC these citizens would be heavily focused in urban areas. It seems likely that they’d prefer to live within a single unified state, rather than being split across Ukraine, White Ruthenia and Poland, lest they go to war with one another again. While this might not necessitate cores in more Eastern areas of Ukraine and Belarus, maybe this can be represented as a modifier that boosts population significantly for Poland? Alternatively, core the western states but put a negative modifier on recruitable population until a focus/decision is completed or something (Like “Appease the Ukrainians”, “Appease the White Ruthenians”, whatever)? Also, I imagine this was done deliberately, but the new Lithuanian borders in the Eastern Europe Rework mean that a considerable portion of it is majority Polish. Least of which Vilnius, Lithuania’s largest city! Like I say, I imagine this was done deliberately because this will lead to a more dynamic and eventful 1936 when Black Monday hits.
Anyway, back to coring western Ruthenia briefly. As far as cores go, there are certainly more outrageous cases in the mod. It would certainly be more likely than Iron Guard Romania annexing Transylvania and getting cores on the Szeklerland, for example, which as of the 1930s was overwhelmingly Hungarian and would despise the Iron Guard. Meanwhile, a considerable population of Ruthenia (mainly the influential and powerful gentry) considered themselves culturally Polish. This is a demographic who I don’t see losing their influence.
I originally wrote a little more here about how all Belarusians and Ukrainians would perhaps accept living in a new Polish Kingdom – but I have to be honest with myself, that’s probably a pipe dream.

A very beautiful pipe dream though, one must admit. Look at that Russian border!
I will, however, draw attention to a few maps map of OTL Poland in 1937:
https://preview.redd.it/khhol1jxtcj51.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d6b8a1a33699e8e5ddaf420eb4aab8770e8b919
https://preview.redd.it/2r7c538ytcj51.png?width=602&format=png&auto=webp&s=0683f42fd12657a745c3d163f95d1acb055b78a9
As we can see, significant populations exist in areas that not only can already be claimed by a revanchist Poland currently, but even some more outside of Poland’s OTL 1930s borders (See the first image), and once again, oftentimes concentrated in densely populated urban areas. Outside of that, Polish or Yiddish is the second language of much of the population (once again, concentrated in the highly populated urban areas), see the second image. It’s also worth repeating that notable OTL Polish figureheads like Józef Piłsudski believed that Poland could function as a multi-national state, with loyalty to the Polish state being valued over assimilation. He was also positively viewed by Polish Jews for this exact policy. Funnily enough, one of Augustyn Czartoryski’s ancestors also (eventually, he didn’t at first) began to champion these same ideals – Adam Jerzy Czartoryski, if my memory serves me right, who was very prominently involved in the 1863 January Uprising.
Now, is this a view that’s going to be championed by others? Well, as of 80-100 years ago, the Polish uprisings certainly indicate that they would have been. Now, though…? Far more unlikely.
The real issue unfortunately is that this territory is held by states that aren’t likely to give them up to Poland without outside pressure. Now, with this said, the 20 or so years that pass that differ from our own timeline could well affect these ethnic boundaries, but for the sake of what we’re proposing here, we’re going to presume it’s nothing so drastic to massively affect the demographics on the maps above.
Germany would be the one divvying up this territory if anyone, which would be an interesting mechanic for the rework if you needed to attempt appeasing your Mitteleuropan puppet states. I won’t touch on that though, because Germany is not the focus of what I’m writing on here.
So, we’ve weighed aspects that could influence whether or not this could happen, and while there certainly exists some, it’s arguably not enough to mean it should get in-game content. And to this, I must appeal to another aspect of the situation, perhaps the same one that led to the Manchu Restoration being implemented for the Qing, and that is this:

POLAND'S HISTORY IS SO BLOODY SAD.

Whether you’re looking at a century of being split apart, being carved up and invaded by nations that are much more powerful or taking advantage of a weakness, being occupied for over a century and brutally oppressed and assimilated, and finally your people getting killed barbarically in WWII, Poland is a country that knows how to take a hit. And in KRTL, it doesn’t even get the momentary high that it got to live for 20 years before 1939 happened. It’s a tiny rump state that’s traded one overlord for another. Their current king is uninspiring to the Polish people and is merely a symbol of German dominance, in the words of the game itself. The most believable path for Poland, all things considered, is perhaps a concession or two from one of the other Mitteleuropan puppet states. Poland’s fate would seem to ultimately be a jewel in the German crown, and nothing else, her borders seriously reduced. Who wants that to be the only outcome? Any other alternative would seem to likely lead to Poland being invaded by her vengeful neighbours like 1939 OTL, and that’s even worse (one needs only to read time after time about hundreds of soldiers who deliberately dug their heels in and sacrificed themselves, just to make the 1939 German invasion last 10 more minutes, to have that illustrated). I digress, but point being, nobody wants that to be the only outcome, that’s just depressing.
I will appeal to the story side of things – Poland is the perfect underdog, a once great power now fallen and humiliated time and time again. Now is the moment for them to reclaim their birthright and dignity, surely! For them to remain a ghastly shadow of their former selves and just another Mitteleuropan puppet state, sure it’s maybe realistic…but it’s just sad, in the same way Qing China remaining dominated by Wu Peifu is sad. Anyway, given that Manchu Qing exists, I’m sure I don’t need to make this point, and the writers and team in charge of KR are considering at least some of what I’ve written so far (though perhaps likely to a less extreme degree as what I've written). In any case, let’s move on!
Is a True Polish King unbelievable?
Anyway, was monarchism dead in Poland around this time KRTL? Well, their nobility certainly was not, or at least not recently. OTL, I believe the szlachta (that is to say the Polish nobility) were only abolished in 1921 within the Polish Republic – something it seems unlikely for the German Empire who’s just installed a Hohenzollern monarch to want to do. Hell, if you wanted an ethnically Polish monarch, you have not only the Czartoryski, but Poniatowski, Potocki and plenty more. The only thing that’s realistically stopping one of them from taking the throne is Germany, who’d rather have August IV there.
But would they really? Look at Belgium as it currently is – Adalbert is despised, and Germany can grant Belgian independence in exchange for Reichspakt participation. It’s a total win-win for Germany to get rid of their despised monarch in favour of a head of state Belgium loves and wants to follow. Adalbert’s situation seems very similar to August’s, if not worse off, since poor old Auwi doesn’t even have his father’s love. Putting Albert back in charge of Belgium is already one of the most blessed parts of the mod, and for something similar to occur in a country as battered and aching for a win as Poland is, would be awesome. It also seems strange that Poland would not be given territory that's majority Polish - but again, I imagine this was chosen deliberately by the team for a more eventful, interesting scenario.
Now, I don’t really know much about how monarchism and its popularity after WWI in Poland, but I did recently speak to two people who do happen to know a fair bit. So I’m going to go through what they said a little bit and some inspiring cool candidates for the Polish throne that they identified.
1. Another German king – but a Catholic one, rather than a Protestant

Meet Duke Albrecht von Wurttemberg!
So from what I’ve heard other people say, this guy was considered by Wilhelm II himself because he was Catholic, and might be a better fit for Poland as a result. I’ve also seen the current Saxon candidate Frederick Christian, as well as Ferdinand I of Romania’s older brother, thrown around as ideas, but this got disputed between the people I asked, with some arguing even a converted Catholic wouldn’t be accepted and that the Germans wanted non-Hohenzollerns on the thrones of these new states. I overall don’t really know much about them, and I find them relatively uninteresting candidates, so I’m going to move on to #2.
2. A Habsburg king like we have now

Hey, I’ve seen this one before…
God, as much as I love the idea of an ethnically Polish noble taking the throne, Karl Albrecht is a really fantastic choice, and I hope he remains as an option, even if he’s still a puppet. OTL in both 1918, the Polish-Soviet War and 1939 he volunteered in the Polish army. When Poland was occupied, he declared himself to be a Polish citizen, defied the Nazi government and got imprisoned, tortured, half-blinded and sent to a concentration camp for doing so. Just as the current KR events and info about him indicate, he was a Polish patriot through and through, and I’d love to see him remain as an option for a Polish king. Hell, given that a more benevolent (and long-sighted) Austria might well yield an allied Poland Galicia-Lodomeria, this might actually be one of the brighter paths Poland could take as a country. This Habsburg is definitely worthy of the throne in my eyes.
3. A member of the szlachta?
Regardless, and to hell with the odds, this would be my favourite option. One that I find myself interested in because there’s so many different & fascinating avenues to be explored. And after speaking to a few people, I heard a few fascinating options given, especially as candidates preferred by local powers:

https://preview.redd.it/4uqjmd8bucj51.png?width=271&format=png&auto=webp&s=59f20f3d2e586957df2b5f25a2589729dcbbd149
Janusz Radziwiłł – So from what I’ve heard and read of this guy, not only was he the Kaiser’s cousin and had strong ties to the Hohenzollerns maternally, but he lived much of his life in Germany and had connections to German aristocracy. With this said, he identified himself as Polish nonetheless, involved himself with the Polish government when it was both a kingdom and a republic following World War One, he supported Piłsudski, and actually refused himself as a candidate to be King of Lithuania (the throne of which would eventually go to Wilhelm Karl von Urach/Mindaugas II). Like Karl Albrecht OTL, he championed Polish independence and suffered greatly for it, getting interred in Lubyanka and personally interrogated by world-class piece of shit Lavrentij Beria, and after his release attempted to improve the lives of Poles by petitioning to the Nazis (he had connections with Goering amongst others) before being imprisoned again by them!
Come on, guys! This guy sounds like a far better functioning alternative than an effeminate, non-Catholic, non-Pole who’s on terrible terms with the Hohenzollerns despite being one paternally, especially given the precedent that minor houses were preferred to be kings of these nations, as well as hitting the cool factor out of the park. If there was a Belgium-esque removal of Auwi in favour of Janusz, surely this would appease all parties: both conservative Catholic Poland and the Kaiser who isn’t exactly very happy with poor old Auwi. Hell, it probably makes Auwi happy as well and he can return to not living in a country that’s as disdainful of him as Poland is.

Jesus, as I write this, I learn that this guy is king of Poland at the game start of Fuhrerreich. Not sure how that makes much sense at all given Fuhrerreich’s circumstances, but whatever
Enough about him though, onto the next guy.

Our guy Augustyn Czartoryski, who I am already mourning since I don’t see his position as “the true Polish king” surviving the rework at all. Read on for more info…
A Czartoryski or Poniatowski – these guys as I understand, while considered, probably wouldn’t be nominated or seriously considered here, due to having a lot of French ancestry (particularly the Poniatowski as I’ve read) and being considered Entente-aligned in general. While these guys would be fantastic, this is already kind of a stretch as it is and I think, as much as I hate to say it, these guys probably wouldn’t be considered by Germany or Austria. Now, if Russia or France was putting a candidate on the throne, that’d be a different story…so maybe these guys could be considered for a pro-Entente puppet government placed in Poland. This seems extremely unlikely to happen though, requiring nothing short of a full-scale Russian or Entente invasion and capitulation of the Reichspakt. And God knows that Russia might more likely have plans of just annexing Poland altogether once again.
God, what a downer. It seems like if these guys are remaining, it’ll just be in sad circumstances. I’d be happy to be proven wrong, of course, so I’ll shut up now and move on to…

Here’s Jerzy Potocki after meeting with FDR thanking him for sending assistance to Poland in 1939.
Jerzy Potocki – This guy could be an alternative to Karl Albrecht, as he has connections with Austria-Hungary. He was OTL a diplomat and was active in Poland’s political scene. Tbh though, I’d probably still prefer Karl Albrecht.
There are likely tons more candidates that I missed, but honestly, I should probably just stop writing this section already, because with all of this said: I’ve already heard that a new king who isn’t August isn’t going to appear by will of Poland itself, but inserted there by a puppet master. This might be subject to change ofc, and if what I wrote here maybe helps that, happy days.
Honestly, I wonder if those words were chosen very carefully when they were said to me almost a year ago. As I’ve written this essay, I’ve begun to not help but wonder if Auwi was deliberately chosen by the Dev team because he’s such an atrocious, ill-fitting King of Poland. It’s a situation that’s incredibly delicate and could be so easily pushed over the edge if, say, an economic crisis were to strike the world in 1936. In other words, Auwi was chosen deliberately to give the player as much choice as humanly possible to, shall we say, have Germany remove him and look for another candidate, like some of the ones I’ve listed. But let’s just assume I’m wrong about that completely, so we can get onto the last section…
A new Rzeczpospolita Polska?
Please correct me if I’m wrong, Polish readers, but “rzeczpospolita” can be translated as both “commonwealth” and “republic”, right? I’ll continue writing presuming as such.
Finally, a truly fantastic pathway I could see Poland take would be some kind of monarchy overthrow, like Belgium. However, unlike Belgium, perhaps their only option will be to declare a republic. While I was initially lukewarm to the idea, with greater thought it’s something that’s kind of appealed to me. With the old Commonwealth being an elective monarchy, perhaps members of the szlachta are able to run as new presidents for this brave new Poland? A phoenix from the ashes, surrounded by enemies all around. A new republic that, just like the commonwealth of old, was functional and perhaps even powerful despite the diverse demographics that existed within her borders. A republic that follows Piłsudski’s philosophy and ideas for the Polish state – perhaps not entirely far-fetched given how influential a figure he was when he was alive, and especially given that he’ll as of 1936 either still be alive or only recently deceased. Perhaps pragmatism would prevail here when it’s realised that if differences aren’t put aside, and they do not get their shit together in time, they risk being put under the Russian boot again, except this time under an ultranationalist regime that will hate them and destroy their culture through the Russification polices of OTL (Assuming that Savinkov being in power is the most likely option here, it’d certainly be the worst-case scenario for Poland).
Furthermore, the ideas that Piłsudski preached seem like they could be utilised by socialists in Poland, but I have no idea if syndicalism would even be a viable option for not only a country that’s staunchly conservative and catholic, but also completely surrounded by other countries that are either conservative, catholic, or both – i.e, opposed to syndicalism. Still, it seems like Britain and France would be the only ones that’d want to support this new Poland’s claims, seeing as unlike Germany, Austria & Russia, Polish claims and French/British ones don’t overlap and cause issues. It could also either be an interesting parallel to OTL Poland and their relationship with the UK and France in the 1930s, but one would hope things end differently this time…

:^(
Now, the szlachta would certainly not be the only candidates, that I will totally acknowledge. Regardless, I feel like a continuation of the old commonwealth’s virtues has such an appeal to it from a narrative perspective, and the descendants of those who once led this great power raising it from the ashes is just perfect, if unlikely. Let us not forget though, that unlikely things have happened a plenty in history, and the option to do these things, in my humble opinion, would enrich Kaiserreich immensely. It’s some of the more unlikely things that occur in Kaiserreich that carry a lot of charm to them. The Kuomintang rising up and winning in China, the Manchu Restoration, the (potential) prevalence of democratic regimes in the crisis-stricken countries of socialist France and Britain, Mittelafrika electing the Reformgruppe and (my personal favourite) the emergence of a constitutional monarchy in Russia against all odds – I could go on, but you all get the point. Kaiserreich’s world is plenty dark and violent, and Poland is well overdue some good fortune - good fortune that would by extension lead to really fun gameplay, world-building and story-telling.
Conclusion
In any case, I’ve probably made my points as well as I’m able to. I also have no idea how finished Poland is as a country in regards to its rework, so I might be writing this too late to be properly considered. However, in the off chance that it’s not nearly finished in regards to the rework, perhaps what I wrote here can help developers in their mission to create a fantastic new Poland. Then again, I’m not Polish and am really an amateur when it comes to historical knowledge, so maybe what I’ve said is already being considered by people with a greater knowledge of history than myself. What is for sure is that the idea that “Poland is not yet lost” rings true very strongly still in KR – and I hope that this sentiment is utilised to its fullest potential.
In either case, that’s all for this one. Thanks for reading!
submitted by TheLesserCornholio to Kaiserreich [link] [comments]

[Thu, Nov 05 2020] TL;DR — This is what you missed in the last 24 hours on Reddit

worldnews

Russia Moves to Grant Ex-Presidents Lifetime Immunity From Prosecution
Comments || Link
Israeli army destroys Palestinian village in Jordan Valley and nearly 80 people have been left homeless
Comments || Link
Record number of Australians sign ex-PM's call for Murdoch inquiry
Comments || Link

news

Mississippi Votes to End Jim Crow Electoral College-Like System; Popular Vote to Choose Governor
Comments || Link
New York Democrat Ritchie Torres elected as the first openly gay Black member of Congress
Comments || Link
Jeffrey Epstein's $22 million Palm Beach mansion will be demolished
Comments || Link

science

Large-diameter trees make up 3% of total stems, but account for 42% of total carbon storage in Pacific Northwest forest ecosystems. Scientists argue that this is among the most effective short-term options for stabilizing climate change and providing other valuable ecosystem services
Comments || Link
Female big-game hunters may have been surprisingly common in the ancient Americas. A woman buried 9,000 years ago with her hunting toolkit is shedding new light on gender roles of the time.
Comments || Link
Researchers at Northwestern University have designed a face mask with the ability to sanitize exhaled respiratory droplets, making the wearer less infectious and protecting others.
Comments || Link

space

With Senate win, Mark Kelly becomes 4th astronaut elected to Congress
Comments || Link
Burst of radio waves in Milky Way probably came from neutron star
Comments || Link
The International Space Station can't last forever. Here's how it will eventually die by fire.
Comments || Link

Futurology

Philippines shuts door on new coal power plant proposals | The Philippines has stopped accepting new proposals for coal-based power projects to encourage investment in other energy sources like natural gas and renewables.
Comments || Link
The Government of Canada has made the decision that it wants to be a launching state and develop a domestic space launch program.
Comments || Link
California just passed a major privacy law that will make it harder for Facebook and Google to track people and gather data
Comments || Link

AskReddit

What is the absolute worst movie you’ve ever seen?
Comments || Link
You get teleported to the day you were born with all the memories from your past life, but you’re now an infant. What do you do?
Comments || Link
What’s recently entered the Public Domain (copyright’s expired) that most people might not be aware of?
Comments || Link

todayilearned

TIL about the 1956 Dutch-American Friendship Treaty. Americans with 4500 Euros can obtain a 2-year visa to work as an independent contractor in Holland. This can be extended long enough to ultimately apply for Dutch/EU citizenship.
Comments || Link
TIL the San Diego Zoo Animals & Plants is the only zoo outside of Australia to have Platypuses. When they were sent from Australia, in 2019, it was the first time in 50 years that Platypuses had been cared for outside of Australia.
Comments || Link
TIL the prevailing theory behind why humans like music is that we learn patterns and regularities within music, and we unconsciously predict what will come next. When we are right, our brain gives us a dopamine rush. Thus the constant dance between expectation and outcome is pleasurable to us
Comments || Link

dataisbeautiful

[OC] 2020 Election betting odds on election night into day after
Comments || Link
The race is close with their names' popularity as well [OC]
Comments || Link
Popular Vote in US Presidential Elections between Democrats and Republicans [OC]
Comments || Link

Cooking

I de-boned an entire chicken in one piece (removed the complete carcass), à la Jacques Pépin. Pretty pleased with myself right now.
Comments || Link
With all the craziness in the world right now, don't forget to start Alton Brown's Aged Eggnog to enjoy next month.
Comments || Link
We had a Korean barbecue for lunch today.
Comments || Link

food

[Homemade] Orecchiette, italian sausage, spinach , mushroom in a creamy tomato white wine sauce
Comments || Link
[Homemade] French bread pizza
Comments || Link
[Homemade] Double Cheese Smash Burgers
Comments || Link

movies

Elsa Raven Dies: ‘Save The Clock Tower’ Lady From ‘Back To The Future’ Was 91
Comments || Link
Stephen King on how to properly adapt his books and which project went ‘entirely off the rails’
Comments || Link
Andy Samberg and Cristin Milioti's ‘Palm Springs’ to Debut in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Netherlands, France and the U.K.
Comments || Link

Art

Space Milk, Me, Digital, 2020
Comments || Link
Mike Pence and His Only Black Friend, B. Howser, Oil and dead fly on canvas, 2020
Comments || Link
crush on you, me, digital,2020
Comments || Link

television

Michael J. Fox Reveals He’s Struggling with Memorization Skills Crucial for Acting
Comments || Link
Why Does Netflix Hate Chicago? Holidate, Emily in Paris, and The Princess Switch all make Chicago seem like a bleak, mall-clogged wasteland of Cubs bars and hats that read “Chicago.”
Comments || Link
‘Saturday Night Live’ Books Foo Fighters for Dave Chappelle Post-Election Episode
Comments || Link

pics

Mr Hinton's first time voting after 30 years on death row for a crime he didn't commit
Comments || Link
Wednesday is trash day in my neighborhood
Comments || Link
Like a fairytail - Woodstock, Vermont
Comments || Link

gifs

When she pulls the thread tight on this perfect denim seam repair 👌
Comments || Link
Kite flying festival.
Comments || Link
I drew this pixel art scene using 4 colors only and called it Moonset [OC]
Comments || Link

educationalgifs

mildlyinteresting

My bathroom window looks like a painting
Comments || Link
The machine that made this penny must’ve missed the coin face by a bit
Comments || Link
Thin beam of sunlight coming through the window curtain looks like subway graffiti
Comments || Link

interestingasfuck

an octopus using shells as shields as a scuba diver approaches it
Comments || Link
My sister's custom mask she had to wear for her brain cancer radiation treatment.
Comments || Link
Sunflowers are Actually Made Up Hundreds of Smaller Flowers in Near Perfect Symmetry.
Comments || Link

funny

The BeeMW
Comments || Link
Playtime with a Feather
Comments || Link
DADDY!!! I heard a ghost [OC]
Comments || Link

aww

It’s the smile for me
Comments || Link
Space buns
Comments || Link
Cat paws
Comments || Link

Random Subreddit of the day: Chiraqology

These are its 3 top posts of all time:
Tadoe & Cuban Doll Sextape 😲😲👀
Comments || Link
Isn’t chiraq related, but RIP Chadwick Boseman. Died at the age of 43 due to cancer.
Comments || Link
Realist Shit I Seen All Day 💯 the way half the internet clowning Duck is fucked up
Comments || Link
submitted by _call-me-al_ to RedditTLDR [link] [comments]

Green and Gold| Part 2| The Takeover: How did that happen?

According to a report published by MUST in July 2019, due to the Glazer takeover of Manchester United, at the then-current payoff rate, United would not be debt-free for another 158 years.[1] Meanwhile, "in the fourteen years since [Glazer] took control at Old Trafford," "just £44million of the more than £660m initially taken out to buy the club has been paid back," while "some £750million has left the club’s bank account simply to service the debt."[1]
In the next installment of our Green and Gold series we will take a closer look at the financial impact of the Glazer takeover and subsequent ownership. But for now, seeing these numbers begs the question: the takeover? How the hell did that happen?
Timeline of Events: A Mini-Guide to a Takeover
The Glazer takeover occurred over multiple years - and multiple bids. The following timeline, created by BBC,[1] provides an overview of the major events, and is included here as a guide for following along with the rest of this post:
Glazer Joins the Ownership Fray
In March 2003, Malcolm Glazer began purchasing shares of Manchester United via a holding company - "Red Football." [1] Initially, the investment was small - approximately 3% of the club. [1] [2]
From there, Mr. Glazer quickly began accumulating shares. By February 2004, Malcolm had accumulated a 16.31% interest in the club, and released a statement saying "he was 'considering options' over Manchester United." [1] [2]
Let the Bidding Begin
On Monday, October 4, 2004, United confirmed it had received a takeover approach, thought to be from Glazer. [1] By that time, Glazer had become United's second largest shareholder, with a holding of 19%. [1] The partnership of John Magnier and JP McManus (through their company, Cubic Expression), owned 29%, and were the club's largest shareholders. [Id.]
The bid would not be accepted.
Undeterred
In the following two weeks, Glazer purchased multiple small tranches of stock to increase his stake. On Friday, October 15, Glazer spent £45m to purchase 15.4 million shares. [1] On the following Monday, October 18, 2004, Glazer spent £17m to boost his overall ownership interest to 27.63%. [1] And on Tuesday, October 19, he purchased a tranche of 1.27 million shares at 285p/share (at a total cost of £3.6m), to boost his holding in the club to 28.11%. [1]
The incremental purchases were important. At the time, under UK law, "anyone who owns a 30% stake in a company is obliged to make an offer for the rest of the company at the price at which they bought their last tranche of shares." [1]
Upon announcement of the purchase, the club's stock price on the London Stock Exchange dipped down 1.5p, to 283.5p. [1]
The additional purchases were reportedly not well-received received by United supporters.
Fan Backlash
According to the BBC, after the October 2004 takeover bid (rumored to be valued at approximately £800m), supporters' groups "were livid, furiously protesting against the [Glazer] proposal." [1]
Sean Bones, of Shareholders United, speaking to the alleged Glazer bid, told BBC Sport at the time: "It's a terrible thing. We don't want a situation where the club is used as part of a loan deal. He will have to take out a large loan and the most likely way of repaying that will be increasing ticket prices." [1]
The opposition to the Glazer bid was not soft-spoken:
Independent Manchester United Supporters Association chairman Jules Spencer has warned: "If Glazer wants a fight, we will give him one."
And Bones, whose group held "Not4Sale" banners outside Old Trafford stadium on Monday, added: "Supporters groups are linking together to defend the club.
"The focus of attention will be to call on all supporters to become shareholders. It will be much cheaper for supporters to own the shares and have an influence on the club.
"Supporters who hold shares want the profits to stay in the club and to go to the benefit of the team and stadium improvements while still having reasonably priced tickets.
"The larger shareholders want profits to be taken away from the club." [1]
An open letter was subsequently sent to then MUFC Chief Executive David Gill asking him to tell the London Stock Exchange's Takeover Panel to order Mr. Glazer to clarify his intentions. If so instructed, the Panel would impose a deadline on Glazer to make a formal bid --- which, if not met, would prohibit an additional takeover bid for 6 months. [1]
Some of the protests were more visible.
United director Maurice Watkins became a target after selling £1m worth of shares to Glazer, and his black Jaguar was daubed with red paint by militant fans' group Manchester Education Committee (MEC).
Its members also invaded the pitch during a United reserve game against Birmingham to protest, while the Red Action Group campaign outside the offices of investment bank JP Morgan, who had been advising Glazer on his bid, before marching to the Stock Exchange. [1]
Meanwhile --- Glazer continued to negotiate with Magnier and McManus over a purchase of their interest. [1]
Glazer "Takes Revenge" and Bids Again
In November, one month after the initial, unsuccessful bid, "the 76-year-old [took] revenge on the club for refusing his stalked takeover bid by blocking the re-elections of United directors Watkins, Andy Anson and Philip Yea at their Annual General Meeting."[1] The action "cost [Glazer,] as JP Morgan dropped him as a client." [1]
One month later (and only two months after the initial bid), in December 2004 Glazer submitted his second takeover bid. David Gill reportedly "snubbed" the offer.[1] The second bid, and the work of Glazer's agents, did not help to improve his image with United's fans.
Following the failed bid, Bob Leffler, a Baltimore, Maryland based PR agent working for Glazer, "claimed fans' fears of the takeover [were] based on 'xenophobia.'" [1] Leffler also said in October 2004 that it was not Glazer's habit to stress his investments with burdensome debt. [1] In response, Mr. Leffler's firm was "targeted with abusive emails and unwanted pizza deliveries." [1]
The Third Bid is Not the Charm
Glazer did not relent. In February 2005, a third bid was received, this one heralded by two of Glazer's sons: Avi and Joel. [1] According to the Financial Times, investment bank NM Rothschild stood behind this bid, at an increased offer of £3 per share. [1]
Fans' anger continued to mount, and the opposition to Glazer's proposed takeover became "even fiercer." [1] MEC "issued threats against the American and his family and any financial institutions involved in supporting the bid on their website and Shareholders United gathered for a peaceful protest in the Old Trafford car park." [1]
United players joined the debate. Then-record-signing Rio Ferdinand and Ryan Giggs both indicated there was no need for ownership to change. [1] Ole Solskjaer also added his voice. On February 15, 2005, Solskjaker accepted an appointment as "the patron of Shareholders United, a group [] vehemently opposed to Glazer's [] takeover plan." [1] Upon accepting, Solskajer said: "I am honoured. I think it is important that the club remains in the right hands. I am absolutely on the supporters' side and think the club is in very good hands as it is today. I am a United fan myself and only want what is best for the future." [1]
Sir Alex Ferguson likewise stated publicly that he opposed the takeover, [1] commenting in November 2004 to a fans' forum that: "There is a stronger rapport between the club and the fans than there has ever been," he said. "We are both of a common denominator; we don't want the club to be in anyone else's hands. That is the way that the club stands with that. I support that." [1]
The third Glazer bid was again unsuccessful. However the chips were beginning to line up --- all Glazer needed for the takeover to be successful would be the support of Cubic Expression - the investment vehicle of horse racing tycoons John Magnier and JP McManus, who at the time still stood as United's biggest shareholder with nearly 29%. [1]
Glazer Wins Control.
On April 28, 2005, the United board indicated it would not recommend Glazer's takeover bid. However, it did not outright reject the bid, either. Instead, the board drew a line down the middle, noting that:
"The board remains of the view that the assumptions in the Glazer business plan are aggressive," United said in a statement. "The board recognises, however, that the price of 300p per share is a fair one and may be attractive to some shareholders of Manchester United.
"Given the board's concerns about the potential impact [of large debts on a debt-free, profitable company] of the proposal, the board has informed Glazer that it cannot provide a recommendation to shareholders to accept any offer made on the basis of the current proposal." [1]
As a result of the Board's statement, the London Exchange's Takeover Panel gave Glazer a "put up or shut up" deadline of May 17 to announce whether he intended to make yet another bid. [1] [2] Given the deadline, it was reported that Glazers would use "fear factor tactics" to persuade McManus and Magnier to sell. [1]
However, this would not be necessary. On Thursday, May 12, 2005, Glazer "won control of Manchester United in a £790m ($1.47bn) takeover bid," with McManus and Magnier selling their 28.7% stake for 300p a share. [1] The bid came just five days ahead of the May 17 deadline. [1] The bid was for the same 300p per share previously offered in 2004. [1]
With that purchase, Malcolm Glazer was able to delist the club from the London Stock Exchange. This step was important - as by "delist[ing] from the stock exchange [] Mr. Glazer could transfer his debt onto the club." [1]
Immediately following the acceptance of the bid, "heavy trading" took place. [1] It was reported that " United's third-biggest shareholder Scottish mining millionaire Harry Dobson [was] already reported to have sold his 6.45% stake after the Irishmen sold theirs," and "[s]hares in Manchester United closed up 34.25 pence, or 12.92%, at 299.25p." [1]
By June 2005, Glazer owned "98% of the Old Trafford club," which "[took] him past the 97.6% level needed to force a compulsory buyout of remaining shareholders" [1] The club, now delisted, belonged to Malcolm Glazer.
Fan Reaction
The successful bid only animated fans:
Some Manchester United fans are so upset that in the last few weeks they have burned Mr. Glazer in effigy outside the stadium, ripped up their season tickets, threatened to disrupt future games and urged a boycott of the team's merchandise and products from sponsors like Nike, which, coincidentally, is an American company.
"That man is not welcome at Old Trafford," said Oliver Houston, spokesman for Shareholders United, a group representing small investors in the team, which had been a publicly traded company. Meanwhile, a militant fan group called the Manchester Education Committee declared Old Trafford to be "occupied territory" and vowed not to rest until it had forced Glazer to sell the team.
The Independent Manchester United Supporters' Association, yet another fans group, is asking supporters to wear black and wave black flags at the Football Association Cup final between Manchester United and Arsenal on Saturday in Cardiff, Wales. [1]
Fans protested outside the stadium last night and an effigy of the new owner was burned, along with season ticket forms, [while] fans chanted and carried banners that said "Not For Sale." [1] [2] [Image]
Fans also questioned Glazer's silence on their intentions for the club:
For Tony Peoples, 35, who works in a paper mill, the problem has to do with attitude. Why, he wondered, has Mr. Glazer not come to Old Trafford to talk to the fans? Why has he not mentioned Manchester United's proud history, its traditions, its larger-than-life importance? "It would be nice if he'd come out and say something and appease people, and put their worries to rest," Mr. Peoples said. [1]
The Rumor Mill: Why did Magnier and McManus Sell?
"In the eyes of many United supporters, Ferguson was to blame for the hugely divisive Glazer takeover in May 2005, with the Florida-based owners of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers profiting from a situation purely of Ferguson’s making. The prevailing view was that, if Ferguson had not become embroiled in a row with the Irish racehorse owners, John Magnier and JP McManus, over his share of stud fees from the Classic-winning Rock of Gibraltar, they in turn would not have slowly stockpiled United shares before selling them to the Glazers. " [1] Stated differently, "many supporters believe the dispute between Ferguson and [Magnier and McManus] eventually led to the Glazer family taking control of United following their purchase of Magnier and McManus’s shares." [1]
So what exactly happened between Sir Alex and MagnieMcManus?
In 2001, Sir Alex Ferguson "was registered ... as a 50 percent owner of the horse [called Rock of Gibraltar] with Susan Magnier, wife of John [Magnier.]" [1] At the time, Sir Alex was known to be "close friends" with Magnier and McManus. [1]
From that day forward, "the horse ran in the colours of the 'Red Devils.'" [1] However, Sir Alex reportedly "hadn't actually paid any money for his share in the horse or contributed to its expensive upkeep." [1] The horse went on to win seven Group 1 races in succession in Ireland, England, and France, and was dubbed by some as the 'wonder horse' of its generation. [1] By the time the horse retired, the stud fee was estimated to potentially be as high as £50m - a figure estimated to dwarf what Sir Alex made for managing United. [1] However, when it came time to decide the details on the horse's future, Magnier and Ferguson reportedly fell at odds. Magnier reportedly indicated "the ownership was a nominal honour that would entitle Alex Ferguson to 50 per cent of Rock of Gibraltar's earnings on the racetrack of £1,164,804 or one stud nomination a year in Ireland and one in Australia, where the horse would 'stand' in the winter. The probable value of these was over €150,000 a year for an expected 10 years. Ferguson initially insisted on his 50 per cent, but as negotiations proceeded, he held out for 15-20 per cent of the stud value of Rock of Gibraltar." [1]
By 2003, two's relationship had strained. [1] Legal proceedings between the two began in High Court in Dublin --- during the time that Malcolm Glazer began staking a claim in the club. [1]
Magnier and McManus then supposedly "put a series of questions through Cubic Expression to the Manchester United board and its solicitors relating to payments to players, the financial organisation of transfer deals and payments to Ferguson himself" which "delayed negotiations between Manchester United and Ferguson on a new contract and Ferguson ... was now put on a rolling yearly contract." [1] The Guardian described it as "an embarrassing list of '99 questions'." [1]
Included among the inquiries the club undertook from those questions was "a potentially embarrassing internal investigation into recent transfer dealings over allegations that an associate of Ferguson's agent son Jason received a commission for the deal involving goalkeeper Tim Howard." [1]
The fight did not play out behind closed doors, either. As the Independent described the dispute years later:
"These questions found their way into the Daily Mail which increased the scrutiny around United. In response the club announced a review of their transfer dealings from January 2001 to January 2004, to be carried out by then finance director Nick Humby.
As it got closer to the broadcast of the Fergie and Son documentary, and the BBC publicity department released some of Millar’s findings, the tension around the club rose. Then, two days before the broadcast of Fergie and Son, United unexpectedly went public with the details of Humby’s transfer review in a move that looked designed to spike the BBC’s guns." [1]
And in terms of the outcome of the club's investigation:
"Of all the United board’s conclusions, the one that made the headlines was that Jason [Ferguson] and Elite would never again be permitted to “act for the club”, although United admitted that they could not stop him representing United players who were existing clients – there were 13 of them. The club cleared themselves, Sir Alex, Jason and Elite of any wrongdoing in transfers, and revealed hitherto unpublished details of payments to agents. United also set out a new proviso that, in the future, agents should declare any connection to employees of United." [1]
By 2004, Magnier and McManus' ownership stood at 28%, and there were rumors they could attempt to take over the club. [1] Meanwhile, Sir Alex and Magnier resolved their lawsuit with a lump sum payment of £2.5m to Sir Alex. [1] The matter was reportedly brought to a close when Sir Alex made a telephone call to Magnier, then in Barbados, which marked "the first time they had spoken since Ferguson fell out with his friend and launched legal proceedings in January [2003]." [1] [2]
Shortly thereafter - Magnier and McManus sold their shares in United to Glazer. [1]
The Role Played by Ed Woodward
Ed Woodward, a Bristol University physics graduate, began his career with PricewaterhouseCoopers' accountancy and tax advisory department in 1993, qualifying as a chartered accountant in 1996. [1] In 1999, he moved to JP Morgan, where he worked as a senior investment banker in their international mergers and acquisitions team. It was there that he advised the Glazer family on their takeover, and was invited to join the club in 2005. [1] As concerns the role he played in advising Glazer, per the Guardian Woodward "came up with the £275m “payment in kind” hedge fund loans at an initial 14.25% interest, to bridge the gap with a £265m bank loan and £270m the family itself put in." [1] These were the same loans that "[w]hen ... refinanced a year later, the hedge fund debts had escalated by £79.1m, which included a £13.2m charge for “early redemption”. [1]
In 2012, Woodward was interviewed, and asked about the Glazers' ownership. In speaking to the debt, Woodward described it like a mortgage:
Our debt, taking a house comparison, is like a mortgage. And it's small relative to the value of the business. And the person living inside it is getting richer and richer and richer in terms of income every year. [1]
How was this different than other club sales?
The Glazers' takeover bid was unique.
Prior to the sale, the club was debt-free. Following the takeover, "[m]ore than one-third of Mr Glazer's £790m offer for the club [was] debt secured against United's assets, such as its Old Trafford stadium, while a further £275m comes from loans from three US hedge funds." [1] The loans leveraged against the club's assets, "originally worth £265m," were "taken out with three hedge funds - Citadel, Och Ziff and Perry Capital." [1]
At one point, the loans held "interest rates on the debt amounting to approximately £62 million a year. A substantial portion of the loans were payment in-kind loans, which the club was paying 16.25% interest on at one point." [1]
Put simply: "The Glazers used around two-thirds of a billion pounds ($859 million) of debt to finance the purchase of the club," and by delisting, were able to "ma[k]e Manchester United responsible for its repayment." [1] This marked "the first time the club had debt since 1931." [1]
We will take a closer look at the debt, and the club's finances, in the next installment in this series.
Past Installments:
Part One: Who are the Glazers?
Next Installment:
Part Three: The Takeover - Financial Fallout of a Leveraged Buyout (title subject to change)
submitted by sauce_murica to reddevils [link] [comments]

uk election outcome odds video

British punters will once again indulge their passion for a cash wager on their country's political future as bookmakers open up bets on the outcome of the Dec. 12 national election. Rutherglen And Hamilton West By Election Winner View all odds; Sadiq Khan To Get Over 50 In First Round View all odds; Scottish Parliament Election 2021 Winner W O Snp View all odds; When Will Johnson be Replaced as PM? View all odds; Welsh Assembly Elections 2021 Most Seats View all odds View all odds. Labour 1/5; Conservatives 5/1; Plaid Cymru 18/1; Liberal Democrats 100/1; Next UK General Betting on the outright winner of the election is not your only option. You can also place a wager on what the election turnout will be. This is one of the most heated issues in recent British political history, so the turnout is expected to be fairly high. Right now, the only UK bookmakers offering odds on election turnout is Betfred. Here are UK election: Most likely outcome, time of results and key battles People across Britain are voting in their millions on Thursday, as the UK election enters its endgame. View the latest odds on Politics Matches & Bet with Sportsbet. Join Australia's Favourite Online Betting and Entertainment Website. UK general election odds for the next vote, expected in 2019. Which party will win the most seats? View all election betting markets here! All polls, trends and election news for the British parliament House of Commons — Conservatives, Labour, Lib Dems, Brexit Party, SNP, Green Party UK polls presented by POLITICO Poll of Polls The GQ bookie provides general election odds analysis with a look at the top ten seats, the fate of the minor parties and betting on the overall result. Election Betting Odds. By Maxim Lott and John Stossel. Why This Beats Polls | Odds from FTX.com, Betfair, Smarkets, and PredictIt | How People Bet. Home | Charts | Track Record NEW: DEM Nomination 2024 | GOP Nomination 2024 2022: Senate, House | 2024 Presidency: Candidates, Parties. Hover over candidate pics for market breakdown. Hover over underlined titles for amount bet. Presidency 2024 Bet on UK - Next General Election - Most Seats and choose among options like Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat and more. On Betfair Exchange, you can either back (bet for) or lay (bet against) any outcome. You can choose to either take the UK - Next General Election - Most Seats odds offered by other players or, if you think an outcome will not happen, set the UK - Next General Election

uk election outcome odds top

[index] [5523] [5160] [5644] [6681] [1000] [4151] [5081] [7293] [1163] [5684]

uk election outcome odds

Copyright © 2024 top.realmoneygame.xyz